ArticleGlobal spine journal2025
Prevalence and Characteristics of Lumbar Spondylolysis in White and Black Patients.
Article in Global spine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective case series.
objectiveTo the best of our knowledge, the prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis in white and black populations has never been studied using computed tomography (CT). The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the prevalence and characteristics of lumbar spondylolysis in white and black patients.
methodsThis study is a cross sectional study. Patients aged 20-79 who underwent abdominal and pelvic CT for trauma screening in the New York City area and whose race was classified as "white" and "black" on the questionnaire were recruited to the study. A total of 1200 white patients (600 women, 600 men) and 1200 black patients (600 women, 600 men) were included for the analysis. The presence of lumbar spondylolysis, level, unilateral/bilateral, and the presence of spondylolisthesis at lumbar spondylolysis level were evaluated using CT.
resultsThe prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was 3.0% (n = 36) for white patients and .8% (n = 10) for black patients, with 3.3% (n = 20) and 1.0% (n = 6) for white and black females, respectively; and 2.7% (n = 16) and .7% (n = 4) for white and black males, respectively. The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was significantly higher in white patients compared with that in black patients (
conclusionsThe prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was 3.0% for white patients and .8% for black patients. The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was significantly higher in white patients compared with that in black patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.