ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024
Diagnosis of focal liver lesions from ultrasound images using a pretrained residual neural network.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Deep learning for developmental dysplasia of the hip: comparative classification strategies for ultrasound imaging with heterogeneous image quality.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- SMC-LUD:Large-Scale B-Mode Liver Ultrasound Dataset for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Hemangioma Classification.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Advancements in artificial intelligence applications for liver ultrasound imaging.BJR artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Explainable fusion of EfficientNetB0 and ResNet50 for liver fibrosis staging in ultrasound imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing ultrasonographic detection of hepatocellular carcinoma with artificial intelligence: current applications, challenges and future directions.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in hepatocellular carcinoma screening: applications and challenges.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Diagnosis of focal liver lesions from ultrasound images using a pretrained residual neural network.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to develop a ResNet50-based deep learning model for focal liver lesion (FLL) classification in ultrasound images, comparing its performance with other models and prior research. METHODOLOGY: We retrospectively collected 581 ultrasound images from the Chulabhorn Hospital's HCC surveillance and screening project (2010-2018). The dataset comprised five classes: non-FLL, hepatic cyst (Cyst), hemangioma (HMG), focal fatty sparing (FFS), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We conducted 5-fold cross-validation after random dataset partitioning, enhancing training data with data augmentation. Our models used modified pre-trained ResNet50, GGN, ResNet18, and VGG16 architectures. Model performance, assessed via confusion matrices for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, was compared across models and with prior studies.
resultsResNet50 outperformed other models, achieving a 5-fold cross-validation accuracy of 87 ± 2.2%. While VGG16 showed similar performance, it exhibited higher uncertainty. In the testing phase, the pretrained ResNet50 excelled in classifying non-FLL, cysts, and FFS. To compare with other research, ResNet50 surpassed the prior methods like two-layered feed-forward neural networks (FFNN) and CNN+ReLU in FLL diagnosis.
conclusionResNet50 exhibited good performance in FLL diagnosis, especially for HCC classification, suggesting its potential for developing computer-aided FLL diagnosis. However, further refinement is required for HCC and HMG classification in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.