ArticleObesity pillars2022
A cross-sectional survey of patients attending follow-up visits after sleeve gastrectomy: Factors affecting weight loss.
Article in Obesity pillars, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bariatric surgery offers long-term weight loss and maintenance for patients with obesity. Several factors may be associated with patients' inability to achieve successful excess weight loss (EWL) after the surgery. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with improved or in-progress EWL among patients who had undergone laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Methods: This original clinical investigation was conducted at the Outpatient Surgical Department-Medical Research Institute Hospital at Alexandria University in Egypt. A sample size of 100 adult surgical patients who had undergone LSG was selected from patients who attended follow-up in the study setting. Group A had an EWL% ≥50 and group B had an EWL <50. Body Mass Index (BMI) classes were defined as 25-30 kg/m Results: Post-operatively, after six months, 100% of the patients in group A had a BMI between 25 and 30 mg/m2, compared to 0% in group B. Nevertheless, patients in group EWL<50 (group B) who had pre-operatively BMI class ≥45 mg/m2, had a reduction in weight of 89.5% post-operatively, (n = 2 still had a BMI >45 kg/m Conclusion: Routine cross-sectional surveying can help clinicians in understanding patients' post-operative follow-up routines. Special attention to pre-operative BMI, weight-loss regimens, and childhood-onset as well as post-operative duration, low responders, and compliance with clinical assessment can improve weight loss outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.