Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37990631›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Generalizable pipeline for constructing HIV risk prediction models across electronic health record systems.

Sarah B May, Thomas P Giordano, Assaf Gottlieb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Machine learning for personalized risk assessment of HIV, syphilis, gonorrhoea and chlamydia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Identify Patients at Risk of HIV Using a Clinical Large Language Model from Electronic Health Records.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah B MayCenter for Precision Health, McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1489-8053
Thomas P GiordanoSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Assaf GottliebCenter for Precision Health, McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4904-631X

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINET15LM007093 · NLM · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI Lydia E. Kavraki · 1992 to 2026
$20.8M
Texas Developmental Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI161943 · NIAID · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SCHMITZ, JOY MARIE · 2021 to 2025
$8.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI161943NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe HIV epidemic remains a significant public health issue in the United States. HIV risk prediction models could be beneficial for reducing HIV transmission by helping clinicians identify patients at high risk for infection and refer them for testing. This would facilitate initiation on treatment for those unaware of their status and pre-exposure prophylaxis for those uninfected but at high risk. Existing HIV risk prediction algorithms rely on manual construction of features and are limited in their application across diverse electronic health record systems. Furthermore, the accuracy of these models in predicting HIV in females has thus far been limited. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe devised a pipeline for automatic construction of prediction models based on automatic feature engineering to predict HIV risk and tested our pipeline on a local electronic health records system and a national claims data. We also compared the performance of general models to female-specific models.

resultsOur models obtain similarly good performance on both health record datasets despite difference in represented populations and data availability (AUC = 0.87). Furthermore, our general models obtain good performance on females but are also improved by constructing female-specific models (AUC between 0.81 and 0.86 across datasets). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsWe demonstrated that flexible construction of prediction models performs well on HIV risk prediction across diverse health records systems and perform as well in predicting HIV risk in females, making deployment of such models into existing health care systems tangible.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHIV InfectionsAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningSoftwareUnited Stateselectronic health recordsHIVHIV preventionpredictive modelingrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID37990631
PMCPMC10873846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.