Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37990545›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical screening2024

Primary care outreach and decision counseling for lung cancer screening.

Heather Bittner Fagan, Claudine Jurkovitz, Zugui Zhang, L Anna Thompson, Freda Patterson, Martha A Zazzarino, Ronald E Myers

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical screening, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heather Bittner FaganDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, ChristianaCare Health Services, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0222-2446
Claudine JurkovitzInstitute for Research in Equity and Community Health (iREACH), ChristianaCare Health Services, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.
Zugui ZhangInstitute for Research in Equity and Community Health (iREACH), ChristianaCare Health Services, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.
L Anna ThompsonDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, ChristianaCare Health Services, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-2569-0324
Freda PattersonDepartment of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Martha A ZazzarinoChristianaCare Health Services, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.
Ronald E MyersDepartment of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Subproject Title: Clinical Research Education, Mentoring and Career Development CoreU54GM104941 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI Megan M Wenner · 2013 to 2026
$60.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLung cancer screening rates are very low despite a level B recommendation from the United States Preventive Services Task Force since 2013 and clear evidence that lung cancer screening reduces mortality. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services requires shared decision-making (SDM) for lung cancer screening reimbursement. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of an SDM intervention on lung cancer screening in primary care.

methodsThe study design was a single-arm clinical trial design. The intervention included phone contact outside of a primary care visit and the use of the Decision Counseling Program ®, an online interactive decision aid focused on determining the factors which influence patients to screen or not screen, prioritizing those factors, and determining a decision preference score. The primary outcome was the completion of low-dose computed tomography scan (LDCT) 1 year after the SDM session compared in participants versus nonparticipants.

resultsFrom six practices, there were 1359 potentially eligible patients in electronic medical record data, and 336 were reached to assess eligibility criteria. A total of 80 patients consented to be in the study, 64 completed a decision counseling session and 16 did not complete a session. Among the 64 people who agreed to have decision counseling, 45% had LDCT, higher than typically seen in routine clinical practice. Although not a comparable group, among the 16 people who declined decision counseling, none had LDCT.

conclusionsDecision counseling is a promising intervention that might support SDM in the context of improving uptake of lung cancer screening in primary care. However, further, larger studies are needed.

Indexed as

CounselingEarly Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsPrimary Health CareAgedDecision MakingDecision Making, SharedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnited Stateslung cancer screeningPrimary careshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID37990545
PMCPMC11646683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.