ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023
Classification of tumor types using XGBoost machine learning model: a vector space transformation of genomic alterations.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Immunoediting and precision biomarkers in prostate cancer: The emerging role of liquid biopsy, immune contexture and HLA genotype (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
- Liquid Biopsy in Colorectal Cancer: Future Perspectives Through the Lens of Artificial Intelligence-A Comprehensive Review of Novel Literature.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- ProteoBoostR: an interactive framework for supervised machine learning in clinical proteomics.Clinical proteomics · 2026Article
- Non-invasive screening of alzheimer's disease via label-free tri-spectral retinal imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-omics driven computational framework for cancer molecular subtype classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pan-cancer gene set discovery via scRNA-seq for optimal deep learning based downstream tasks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A multi-representation deep-learning framework for accurate multicancer classification.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Explainable AI Model Reveals Informative Mutational Signatures for Cancer-Type Classification.Cancers · 2025Article
- Prediction of in-hospital death among patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital over the first 10 years: a machine learning approach.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Integrative analysis of miRNA expression data reveals a minimal signature for tumour cells classification.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Review
- Predicting early gastric cancer risk using machine learning: A population-based retrospective study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning (ML) represents a powerful tool to capture relationships between molecular alterations and cancer types and to extract biological information. Here, we developed a plain ML model aimed at distinguishing cancer types based on genetic lesions, providing an additional tool to improve cancer diagnosis, particularly for tumors of unknown origin.
methodsTCGA data from 9,927 samples spanning 32 different cancer types were downloaded from cBioportal. A vector space model type data transformation technique was designed to build consistently homogeneous new datasets containing, as predictive features, calls for somatic point mutations and copy number variations at chromosome arm-level, thus allowing the use of the XGBoost classifier models. Considering the imbalance in the dataset, due to large difference in the number of cases for each tumor, two preprocessing strategies were considered: i) setting a percentage cut-off threshold to remove less represented cancer types, ii) dividing cancer types into different groups based on biological criteria and training a specific XGBoost model for each of them. The performance of all trained models was mainly assessed by the out-of-sample balanced accuracy (BACC) and the AUC scores.
resultsThe XGBoost classifier achieved the best performance (BACC 77%; AUC 97%) on a dataset containing the 10 most represented tumor types. Moreover, dividing the 18 most represented cancers into three different groups (endocrine-related carcinomas, other carcinomas and other cancers),such analysis models achieved 78%, 71% and 86% BACC, respectively, with AUC scores greater than 96%. In addition, the model capable of linking each group to a specific cancer type reached 81% BACC and 94% AUC. Overall, the diagnostic potential of our model was comparable/higher with respect to others already described in literature and based on similar molecular data and ML approaches.
conclusionsA boosted ML approach able to accurately discriminate different cancer types was developed. The methodology builds datasets simpler and more interpretable than the original data, while keeping enough information to accurately train standard ML models without resorting to sophisticated Deep Learning architectures. In combination with histopathological examinations, this approach could improve cancer diagnosis by using specific DNA alterations, processed by a replicable and easy-to-use automated technology. The study encourages new investigations which could further increase the classifier's performance, for example by considering more features and dividing tumors into their main molecular subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.