Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37990171›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

The smoking and vaping model, A user-friendly model for examining the country-specific impact of nicotine VAPING product use: application to Germany.

Luz María Sánchez-Romero, Alex C Liber, Yameng Li, Zhe Yuan, Jamie Tam, Nargiz Travis, Jihyoun Jeon, Mona Issabakhsh, Rafael Meza, David T Levy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luz María Sánchez-RomeroLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Ave, suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA. ls1364@georgetown.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7951-3965
Alex C LiberLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Ave, suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Yameng LiLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Ave, suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Zhe YuanLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Ave, suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Jamie TamSchool of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Nargiz TravisLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Ave, suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Jihyoun JeonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Mona IssabakhshLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Ave, suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Rafael MezaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
David T LevyLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Ave, suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-3612

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation Among Youth in the US, Canada, and England: Methods to Predict Uptake and Policy EfficacyP01CA200512 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI FONG, GEOFFREY T · 2016 to 2025
$25.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P01 CA200512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimulation models play an increasingly important role in tobacco control. Models examining the impact of nicotine vaping products (NVPs) and smoking tend to be highly specialized and inaccessible. We present the Smoking and Vaping Model (SAVM),a user-friendly cohort-based simulation model, adaptable to any country, that projects the public health impact of smokers switching to NVPs.

methodsSAVM compares two scenarios. The No-NVP scenario projects smoking rates in the absence of NVPs using population projections, deaths rates, life expectancy, and smoking prevalence. The NVP scenario models vaping prevalence and its impact on smoking once NVPs became popular. NVP use impact is estimated as the difference in smoking- and vaping-attributable deaths (SVADs) and life-years lost (LYLs) between the No-NVP and NVP scenarios. We illustrate SAVM's adaptation to the German adult ages 18+ population, the Germany-SAVM by adjusting the model using population, mortality, smoking and NVP use data.

resultsAssuming that the excess NVP mortality risk is 5% that of smoking, Germany-SAVM projected 4.7 million LYLs and almost 300,000 SVADs averted associated with NVP use from 2012 to 2060. Increasing the excess NVP mortality risk to 40% with other rates constant resulted in averted 2.8 million LYLs and 200,000 SVADs during the same period.

conclusionsSAVM enables non-modelers, policymakers, and other stakeholders to analyze the potential population health effects of NVP use and public health interventions.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking CessationVapingAdultHumansNicotineSmokingTobacco SmokingNicotineComputer simulationGermanyPopulation healthPrevalenceTobacco smokingVaping

Identifiers

PMID37990171
PMCPMC10662637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.