ArticleBMC genomics2023
Constructing gene similarity networks using co-occurrence probabilities.
Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- MS-ConTab: multi-scale contrastive learning of mutation signatures for Pan-Cancer representation and stratification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- MO-GCAN: multi-omics integration based on graph convolutional and attention networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Network analysis of driver genes in human cancers.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Gene similarity networks play important role in unraveling the intricate associations within diverse cancer types. Conventionally, gauging the similarity between genes has been approached through experimental methodologies involving chemical and molecular analyses, or through the lens of mathematical techniques. However, in our work, we have pioneered a distinctive mathematical framework, one rooted in the co-occurrence of attribute values and single point mutations, thereby establishing a novel approach for quantifying the dissimilarity or similarity among genes. Central to our approach is the recognition of mutations as key players in the evolutionary trajectory of cancer. Anchored in this understanding, our methodology hinges on the consideration of two categorical attributes: mutation type and nucleotide change. These attributes are pivotal, as they encapsulate the critical variations that can precipitate substantial changes in gene behavior and ultimately influence disease progression. Our study takes on the challenge of formulating similarity measures that are intrinsic to genes' categorical data. Taking into account the co-occurrence probability of attribute values within single point mutations, our innovative mathematical approach surpasses the boundaries of conventional methods. We thereby provide a robust and comprehensive means to assess gene similarity and take a significant step forward in refining the tools available for uncovering the subtle yet impactful associations within the complex realm of gene interactions in cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.