ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023
Improved quality metrics for association and reproducibility in chromatin accessibility data using mutual information.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- SLUR(M)-py: a SLURM powered Pythonic pipeline for parallel processing of 3D (Epi)genomic profiles.Epigenomics · 2025Article
- Disruption of histone acetylation homeostasis reveals multilayered chromatin regulation for transcriptional resiliency.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2025Article
- Multi-omics analysis reveals the dynamic interplay between Vero host chromatin structure and function during vaccinia virus infection.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Human Coronavirus Infection Reorganizes Spatial Genomic Architecture in Permissive Lung Cells.Research square · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCorrelation metrics are widely utilized in genomics analysis and often implemented with little regard to assumptions of normality, homoscedasticity, and independence of values. This is especially true when comparing values between replicated sequencing experiments that probe chromatin accessibility, such as assays for transposase-accessible chromatin via sequencing (ATAC-seq). Such data can possess several regions across the human genome with little to no sequencing depth and are thus non-normal with a large portion of zero values. Despite distributed use in the epigenomics field, few studies have evaluated and benchmarked how correlation and association statistics behave across ATAC-seq experiments with known differences or the effects of removing specific outliers from the data. Here, we developed a computational simulation of ATAC-seq data to elucidate the behavior of correlation statistics and to compare their accuracy under set conditions of reproducibility.
resultsUsing these simulations, we monitored the behavior of several correlation statistics, including the Pearson's R and Spearman's [Formula: see text] coefficients as well as Kendall's [Formula: see text] and Top-Down correlation. We also test the behavior of association measures, including the coefficient of determination R[Formula: see text], Kendall's W, and normalized mutual information. Our experiments reveal an insensitivity of most statistics, including Spearman's [Formula: see text], Kendall's [Formula: see text], and Kendall's W, to increasing differences between simulated ATAC-seq replicates. The removal of co-zeros (regions lacking mapped sequenced reads) between simulated experiments greatly improves the estimates of correlation and association. After removing co-zeros, the R[Formula: see text] coefficient and normalized mutual information display the best performance, having a closer one-to-one relationship with the known portion of shared, enhanced loci between simulated replicates. When comparing values between experimental ATAC-seq data using a random forest model, mutual information best predicts ATAC-seq replicate relationships.
conclusionsCollectively, this study demonstrates how measures of correlation and association can behave in epigenomics experiments. We provide improved strategies for quantifying relationships in these increasingly prevalent and important chromatin accessibility assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.