ArticleScientific reports2023
Modelling the effectiveness of surveillance based on metagenomics in detecting, monitoring, and forecasting antimicrobial resistance in livestock production under economic constraints.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of Multidrug-ResistantAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Recent insights into actinobacteria research in antimicrobial resistance: a review.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial resistance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Current surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is mostly based on testing indicator bacteria using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) panels. Metagenomics has the potential to identify all known antimicrobial resistant genes (ARGs) in complex samples and thereby detect changes in the occurrence earlier. Here, we simulate the results of an AMR surveillance program based on metagenomics in the Danish pig population. We modelled both an increase in the occurrence of ARGs and an introduction of a new ARG in a few farms and the subsequent spread to the entire population. To make the simulation realistic, the total cost of the surveillance was constrained, and the sampling schedule was set at one pool per month with 5, 20, 50, or 100 samples. Our simulations demonstrate that a pool of 20-50 samples and a sequencing depth of 250 million fragments resulted in the shortest time to detection in both scenarios, with a time delay to detection of change of [Formula: see text]15 months in all scenarios. Compared with culture-based surveillance, our simulation indicates that there are neither significant reductions nor increases in time to detect a change using metagenomics. The benefit of metagenomics is that it is possible to monitor all known resistance in one sampling and laboratory procedure in contrast to the current monitoring that is based on the phenotypic characterisation of selected indicator bacterial species. Therefore, overall changes in AMR in a population will be detected earlier using metagenomics due to the fact that the resistance gene does not have to be transferred to and expressed by an indicator bacteria before it is possible to detect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.