ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2023
Group membership modulates the hold-up problem: an event-related potentials and oscillations study.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroimaging Findings of Psychosis in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review.Brain and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Machine-learning methods for epilepsy diagnosis and therapeutic prevention: advances, setbacks, and opportunities.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- REST/NRSF Regulation of Epilepsy and Cognitive Impairment: Mechanisms and EEG Correlations.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- Spectral feature modeling with graph signal processing for brain connectivity in autism spectrum disorder.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A deep learning approach to stress recognition through multimodal physiological signal image transformation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessing public perception and parametric analysis of municipal solid waste management solutions in Tabuk City, Saudi Arabia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Employing artificial bee and ant colony optimization in machine learning techniques as a cognitive neuroscience tool.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effects of induced electric field on the sensitivity of a two-compartment neuron model.PloS one · 2025Article
- Research on sports activity behavior prediction based on electromyography signal collection and intelligent sensing channel.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- Article
- PulmoNet: a novel deep learning based pulmonary diseases detection model.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This paper investigates the neural mechanism that underlies the effect of group identity on hold-up problems. The behavioral results indicated that the investment rate among members of the in-group was significantly higher than that of the out-group. In comparison to the NoChat treatment, the Chat treatment resulted in significantly lower offers for both in-group and out-group members. The event-related potentials (ERP) results demonstrated the presence of a distinct N2 component in the frontal midline of the brain when investment decisions were made for both in-group and out-group members. During the offer decision-making stage, the P3 peak amplitude was significantly larger when interacting with in-group members compared to the out-group members. The event-related potentials oscillations (ERO) results indicated that when investment decisions were made for in-group members in the NoChat treatment, the beta band (18-28 Hz, 250-350 ms) power was more pronounced than when decisions were made for out-group members. In the NoChat treatment, offer decisions for in-group members yielded a more pronounced difference in beta band (15-20 Hz, 200-300 ms) power when compared to out-group members. Evidence from this study suggests that group identity can reduce the hold-up problem and corroborates the neural basis of group identity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.