Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37990005›Full record

ArticleHip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy2024

Long-term follow-up and survival of delayed total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fracture: a matched cohort study of 552 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Ragnhild Loven Kirkeboe, Lars Nordsletten, Jan Erik Madsen, Eva Dybvik, Stein Atle Lie, Geir Hallan, John Clarke-Jenssen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ragnhild Loven KirkeboeDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4607-991X
Lars NordslettenDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jan Erik MadsenDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Eva DybvikThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.
Stein Atle LieThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.
Geir HallanThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.
John Clarke-JenssenDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOperative treatment of acetabular fractures generally yields good results, but several authors report up to 15-20% of patients developing post-traumatic osteoarthritis (OA). Previous studies have shown that total hip arthroplasty (THA) following post-traumatic OA have inferior results compared to THA for primary OA. The aim of this study was to report on long-term outcome of THA following acetabular fracture, compared to primary OA. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a matched cohort study with data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR). All patients receiving THA following an acetabular fracture between 1987 and 2018 were identified. A 3:1 matched cohort consisting of patients treated for primary OA with THA was selected using propensity scores and matched for age, gender and year of surgery. Survival analysis was performed with revision of any cause as endpoint. Cox regression was used to identify factors associated with risk of revision surgery.

results552 cases were identified, 397 men and 155 women. Mean age was 58.8 (11-91) years. 224 had previously been operated for the acetabular fracture, 328 had been treated non-operatively. Mean follow up time was 8.7 (1-29) years. Implant survival at 10 years was 79.7% (75.6-83.3) and at 20 years 62.4% (55.5-69.3). The hazard ratio for revision was 1.38 (1.07-1.77,

conclusionsTHA following an acetabular fracture can be performed with acceptable results regarding implant survival, however, we report an increased risk for revision when compared to primary OA. Our results indicate that previous operative fracture treatment does not increase the risk for THA revision compared to cases treated non-operatively.

Indexed as

AcetabulumArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFractures, BoneOsteoarthritis, HipRegistriesReoperationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHip ProsthesisHumansAcetabulumpost-traumatic arthritissecondary total hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID37990005
PMCPMC11071598
OpenAlexW4388911201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.