Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37989978›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2023

The Quest for Circulating Biomarkers in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: a Clinical Perspective.

Laura Mariën, Odeta Islam, Siddharth Chhajlani, Willem Lybaert, Marc Peeters, Guy Van Camp, Ken Op de Beeck, Timon Vandamme

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura MariënCenter of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Prins Boudewijnlaan 43, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8838-0607
Odeta IslamIntegrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Siddharth ChhajlaniCenter of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Prins Boudewijnlaan 43, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6291-0371
Willem LybaertNETwerk and Department of Oncology, VITAZ, Lodewijk de Meesterstraat 5, 9100, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Marc PeetersIntegrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4969-2303
Guy Van CampCenter of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Prins Boudewijnlaan 43, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5105-9000
Ken Op de BeeckCenter of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Prins Boudewijnlaan 43, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5527-6838
Timon VandammeIntegrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium. Timon.Vandamme@uantwerpen.be.ORCID 0000-0003-3701-5305
University of Antwerp · BE

Funding

Research Foundation Flanders 1803723NResearch Foundation Flanders 1S94923N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementGiven the considerable heterogeneity in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), it appears unlikely that a sole biomarker exists capable of fully capturing all useful clinical aspects of these tumors. This is reflected in the abundant number of biomarkers presently available for the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of NEN patients. Although assessment of immunohistochemical and radiological markers remains paramount and often obligatory, there has been a notable surge of interest in circulating biomarkers over the years given the numerous benefits associated with liquid biopsies. Currently, the clinic primarily relies on single-analyte assays such as the chromogranin A assay, but these are far from ideal because of limitations such as compromised sensitivity and specificity as well as a lack of standardization. Consequently, the quest for NEN biomarkers continued with the exploration of multianalyte markers, exemplified by the development of the NETest and ctDNA-based analysis. Here, an extensive panel of markers is simultaneously evaluated to identify distinct signatures that could enhance the accuracy of patient diagnosis, prognosis determination, and response to therapy prediction and monitoring. Given the promising results, the development and implementation of these multianalyte markers are expected to usher in a new era of NEN biomarkers in the clinic. In this review, we will outline both clinically implemented and more experimental circulating markers to provide an update on developments in this rapidly evolving field.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorNeuroendocrine TumorsHumansLiquid BiopsyPrognosisSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorCirculating tumor cellsCirculating tumor DNAMinimally invasive biomarkersNETestNeuroendocrine neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID37989978
OpenAlexW4388880217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.