ArticleJournal of neurology2024
Differentiation of speech in Parkinson's disease and spinocerebellar degeneration using deep neural networks.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning-Based Assessment of Brainstem Volume Changes in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 (SCA2): A Study on Patients and Preclinical Subjects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical Decision Support Using Speech Signal Analysis: Systematic Scoping Review of Neurological Disorders.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Prognostic and relapsing factors of primary autoimmune cerebellar ataxia: a prospective cohort study.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAssessing dysarthria features in patients with neurodegenerative diseases helps diagnose underlying pathologies. Although deep neural network (DNN) techniques have been widely adopted in various audio processing tasks, few studies have tested whether DNNs can help differentiate neurodegenerative diseases using patients' speech data. This study evaluated whether a DNN model using a transformer architecture could differentiate patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) from patients with spinocerebellar degeneration (SCD) using speech data.
methodsSpeech data were obtained from 251 and 101 patients with PD and SCD, respectively, while they read a passage. We fine-tuned a pre-trained DNN model using log-mel spectrograms generated from speech data. The DNN model was trained to predict whether the input spectrogram was generated from patients with PD or SCD. We used fivefold cross-validation to evaluate the predictive performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsAverage ± standard deviation of the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the trained model for the fivefold cross-validation were 0.93 ± 0.04, 0.87 ± 0.03, 0.83 ± 0.05, and 0.89 ± 0.05, respectively.
conclusionThe DNN model can differentiate speech data of patients with PD from that of patients with SCD with relatively high accuracy and AUC. The proposed method can be used as a non-invasive, easy-to-perform screening method to differentiate PD from SCD using patient speech and is expected to be applied to telemedicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.