Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37989954›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024

A Practical Guide to Inflow Control, Retraction, and Exposure for Robotic Hepatectomy.

Anish J Jain, Timothy E Newhook, Elizabeth Lilley, Naruhiko Ikoma, Ching-Wei D Tzeng, Yun Shin Chun, Jean Nicolas Vauthey, Hop S Tran Cao

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anish J JainDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8695-3969
Timothy E NewhookDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Elizabeth LilleyDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Naruhiko IkomaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ching-Wei D TzengDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Yun Shin ChunDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jean Nicolas VautheyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Hop S Tran CaoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. hstran@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishment of inflow control and gentle effective retraction of the liver for optimal exposure are critical to safe hepatectomy. Multiple methods have been previously reported for inflow control in minimally invasive (MIS) hepatectomy including Huang's Loop.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyLiver NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresBlood Loss, SurgicalHepatectomyHumansLiver CirrhosisHuang’s loopInflow controlLiver retractionMinimally invasive hepatectomyPringle maneuverRobotic hepatectomy

Identifiers

PMID37989954
OpenAlexW4388867595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.