Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37989942›Full record

SynthesisCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2024

Indirect laryngoscopy is more effective than direct laryngoscopy when tracheal intubation is performed by novice operators: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.

Hiroshi Hoshijima, Takahiro Mihara, Toshiya Shiga, Kentaro Mizuta

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hiroshi HoshijimaDivision of Dento-Oral Anesthesiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan. hhoshi6@gmail.com.
Takahiro MiharaDepartment of Health Data Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Data Science, Yokohama, Japan.
Toshiya ShigaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Ichikawa, Japan.
Kentaro MizutaDivision of Dento-Oral Anesthesiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether indirect laryngoscopy has an advantage over direct laryngoscopy in terms of the tracheal intubation rate, glottic visualization, and intubation time when used by novice operators.

methodsWe extracted adult prospective randomized trials comparing tracheal intubation with indirect vs direct laryngoscopy in novice operators from electronic databases. We extracted the following data from the identified studies: success rate, glottic visualization, and intubation time. Data from each trial were combined via a random-effects model to calculate the pooled relative risk (RR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We also performed a trial sequential analysis.

resultsWe included 15 articles (17 trials) comprising 2,290 patients in the systematic review. Compared with the direct laryngoscopy, indirect laryngoscopy improved success rate (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.24; P = 0.0002; I

conclusionIn this systematic review, we found that the tracheal intubation success rate, glottic visualization, and intubation time were improved when novice operators used indirect laryngoscopy rather than direct laryngoscopy. Trial sequential analysis results indicated that the sample size was sufficient for examining the success rate and intubation time. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022309045); first registered 4 September 2022.

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealLaryngoscopyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdultClinical CompetenceGlottisHumansTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID37989942
PMCPMC10884075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.