Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37989939›Full record

Trial reportCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2024

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Ling Xin, Lu Wang, Yi Feng

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06584981 (Effect of PECS II, Parasternal and Serratus Plane Blocks on Postoperative Pain in MIDCAB Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06584981 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of PECS II, Parasternal and Serratus Plane Blocks on Postoperative Pain in MIDCAB Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorHisar Intercontinental HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled88ConditionsPain, Postoperative, Coronary Artery DiseaseArmspectoral nerve block (PECS II), parasternal and serratus plane blocks, analgesic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Anesthesia for Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ling XinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0699-7732
Lu WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yi FengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China. doctor_yifeng@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3952-1351
Peking University · CN

Funding

Peking University People's Hospital 2021-Z-87
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMinimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for analgesia after MIDCAB.

methodsWe conducted randomized controlled trial in 60 patients undergoing MIDCAB who received either a single-shot ESPB with 30 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% (ESPB group, n = 30) or normal saline 0.9% (control group, n = 30). The primary outcome was numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores at rest within 48 hr postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included postoperative NRS pain scores on deep inspiration within 48 hr, hydromorphone consumption, and quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 and 48 hr.

resultsCompared with the control group, the ESPB group had lower NRS pain scores at rest at 6 hr (estimated mean difference, -2.1; 99% confidence interval [CI], -2.7 to -1.5; P < 0.001), 12 hr (-1.9; 99% CI, -2.6 to -1.2; P < 0.001), and 18 hr (-1.2; 99% CI, -1.8 to -0.6; P < 0.001) after surgery. The ESPB group also showed lower pain scores on deep inspiration at 6 hr (-2.9; 99% CI, -3.6 to -2.1; P < 0.001), 12 hr (-2.3; 99% CI, -3.1 to -1.5; P < 0.001), and 18 hr (-1.0; 99% CI, -1.8 to -0.2; P = 0.01) postoperatively. Patients in the ESPB group had lower total intraoperative fentanyl use, lower 24-hr hydromorphone consumption, a shorter time to extubation, and a shorter time to intensive care unit (ICU) discharge.

conclusionErector spinae plane block provided early effective postoperative analgesia and reduced opioid consumption, time to extubation, and ICU discharge in patients undergoing MIDCAB.

trial registrationwww.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100052810); registered 5 November 2021.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalCoronary Artery BypassMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNerve BlockPostoperative PainUltrasonography, InterventionalAgedAnalgesics, OpioidDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHydromorphoneMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementParaspinal MusclesAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalHydromorphoneRopivacaineerector spinae blockminimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgerynerve blockpostoperative painultrasound-guided

Identifiers

PMID37989939
PMCPMC11233300
OpenAlexW4388868324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.