ArticleScientific reports2023
Crystal plasticity simulations with representative volume element of as-build laser powder bed fusion materials.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stress-strain curve predictions by crystal plasticity simulations and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing of as-build metal materials with laser powder bed fusion typically leads to the formations of various chemical phases and their corresponding microstructure types. Such microstructures have very complex shape and size anisotropic distributions due to the history of the laser heat gradients and scanning patterns. With higher complexity compared to the post-heat-treated materials, the synthetic volume reconstruction of as-build materials for accurate modelling of their mechanical properties is a serious challenge. Here, we present an example of complete workflow pipeline for such nontrivial task. It takes into account the statistical distributions of microstructures: object sizes for each phase, several shape parameters for each microstructure type, and their morphological and crystallographic orientations. In principle, each step in the pipeline, including the parameters in the crystal plasticity model, can be fine-tuned to achieve suitable correspondence between experimental and synthetic microstructures as well as between experimental stress-strain curves and simulated results. To our best knowledge, this work represents an example of the most challenging synthetic volume reconstruction for as-build additive manufacturing materials to date.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.