Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37989841›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Crystal plasticity simulations with representative volume element of as-build laser powder bed fusion materials.

Dmitry S Bulgarevich, Sukeharu Nomoto, Makoto Watanabe, Masahiko Demura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dmitry S BulgarevichNational Institute for Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0047, Japan. bulgarevich.dmitry@nims.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7086-8396
Sukeharu NomotoNational Institute for Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0047, Japan.
Makoto WatanabeNational Institute for Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0047, Japan.
Masahiko DemuraNational Institute for Materials Science, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0047, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing of as-build metal materials with laser powder bed fusion typically leads to the formations of various chemical phases and their corresponding microstructure types. Such microstructures have very complex shape and size anisotropic distributions due to the history of the laser heat gradients and scanning patterns. With higher complexity compared to the post-heat-treated materials, the synthetic volume reconstruction of as-build materials for accurate modelling of their mechanical properties is a serious challenge. Here, we present an example of complete workflow pipeline for such nontrivial task. It takes into account the statistical distributions of microstructures: object sizes for each phase, several shape parameters for each microstructure type, and their morphological and crystallographic orientations. In principle, each step in the pipeline, including the parameters in the crystal plasticity model, can be fine-tuned to achieve suitable correspondence between experimental and synthetic microstructures as well as between experimental stress-strain curves and simulated results. To our best knowledge, this work represents an example of the most challenging synthetic volume reconstruction for as-build additive manufacturing materials to date.

Identifiers

PMID37989841
PMCPMC10663526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.