Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37989791›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2023

Agreement of pCO

Matthias Jörg, Malin Öster, Jens Wretborn, Daniel B Wilhelms

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthias JörgDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sundsvall Regional Hospital, Region Västernorrland, Sundsvall, Sweden. matthias.jorg@liu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1805-5283
Malin ÖsterDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Local Health Care Services in Central Östergötland, Region Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden.
Jens WretbornDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58185, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0549-6805
Daniel B WilhelmsDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58185, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6347-3970
Linköping University · SECounty Administrative Board · SE

Funding

Region Östergötland LIO-532001Region Östergötland LIO-700271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenous blood gas sampling has replaced arterial sampling in many critically ill patients, though interpretation of venous pCO

resultsTwo hundred and fifty blood gas pairs were collected consecutively between October 2021 and April 2022, 243 valid pairs were used in the final analysis [mean age 72.8 years (SD 17.8), 47% females]. Respiratory distress was the most common clinical indication (84% of all cases). The model of Farkas showed the best metrics with a mean difference between estimated and arterial pCO

conclusionArterial pCO

Indexed as

ArterialBlood gasConversionEmergency departmentpCO2Venous

Identifiers

PMID37989791
PMCPMC10663424
OpenAlexW4388867779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.