ArticleMitochondrion2024
Mitochondrial DNA mutation pathogenicity score and neurocognitive performance in persons with HIV.
Article in Mitochondrion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genetic variation is associated with neurocognitive (NC) impairment (NCI) in people with HIV (PWH). Other approaches use sequence conservation and protein structure to predict the impact of mtDNA variants on protein function. We examined predicted mtDNA variant pathogenicity in the CHARTER study using MutPred scores, hypothesizing that persons with higher scores (greater predicted pathogenicity) have more NCI.
methodsCHARTER included NC testing in PWH from 2003 to 2007. MutPred scores were assigned to CHARTER participants with mtDNA sequence; any score > 0.5 was considered potentially deleterious. Outcomes at cohort entry were NCI, defined by global and seven NC domain deficit scores, and by mean global and domain NC performance T-scores. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses assessed associations between having a deleterious variant and NCI. Additional models included estimated peripheral blood cell mtDNA copy number.
resultsData were available for 744 PWH (357 African ancestry; 317 European; 70 Hispanic). In the overall cohort, PWH having any potentially deleterious variant were less likely to have motor impairment (16 vs. 25 %, p = 0.001). In multivariable analysis, having a deleterious variant remained associated with lower likelihood of motor impairment (adjusted odds ratio 0.59 [95 % CI 0.41-0.88]; p = 0.009), and better motor performance by T-score (β 1.71 [0.31-3.10], p = 0.02). Associations persisted after adjustment for estimated mtDNA quantity.
conclusionsIn these PWH, having a potentially deleterious mtDNA variant was associated with less motor impairment. These unexpected findings suggest that potentially deleterious mtDNA variations may confer protection against impaired motor function by as yet unknown mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.