Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37989388›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2023

WHY STOP? A prospective observational vignette-based study to determine the cognitive-behavioural effects of rapid diagnostic PCR-based point-of-care test results on antibiotic cessation in ICU infections.

Suveer Singh, Martine Nurek, Sonia Mason, Luke Sp Moore, Nabeela Mughal, Marcela P Vizcaychipi

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Suveer Singh *Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK suveer.singh@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-8966
Martine Nurek *Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4252-4692
Sonia MasonGuy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Luke Sp MooreImperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7095-7922
Nabeela MughalImperial College London, London, UK.
Marcela P VizcaychipiAPMIC, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7894-873X
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPoint-of-care tests (POCTs) for infection offer accurate rapid diagnostics but do not consistently improve antibiotic stewardship (ASP) of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. We aimed to measure the effect of a negative PCR-POCT result on intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians' antibiotic decisions and the additional effects of patient trajectory and cognitive-behavioural factors (clinician intuition, dis/interest in POCT, risk averseness).

designObservational cohort simulation study.

settingICU.

participants70 ICU consultants/trainees working in UK-based teaching hospitals.

methodsClinicians saw four case vignettes describing patients who had completed a course of antibiotics for respiratory infection. Vignettes comprised clinical and biological data (ie, white cell count, C reactive protein), varied to create four trajectories: clinico-biological improvement (the 'improvement' case), clinico-biological worsening ('worsening'), clinical improvement/biological worsening ('discordant clin better'), clinical worsening/biological improvement ('discordant clin worse'). Based on this, clinicians made an initial antibiotics decision (stop/continue) and rated confidence (6-point Likert scale). A PCR-based POCT was then offered, which clinicians could accept or decline. All clinicians (including those who declined) were shown the result, which was negative. Clinicians updated their antibiotics decision and confidence. MEASURES: Antibiotics decisions and confidence were compared pre-POCT versus post-POCT, per vignette.

resultsA negative POCT result increased the proportion of stop decisions (54% pre-POCT vs 70% post-POCT, χ

conclusionsA negative PCR-POCT result can encourage antibiotic cessation in ICU, notably in cases of clinical worsening (where the inclination might otherwise be to continue). This effect may be reduced by high clinician confidence to continue and/or disinterest in POCT, perhaps due to low trust/perceived utility. Such cognitive-behavioural and trajectorial factors warrant greater consideration in future ASP study design.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsRapid Diagnostic TestsCognitionHumansIntensive Care UnitsPoint-of-Care TestingPolymerase Chain ReactionAnti-Bacterial Agentsadult intensive & critical carediagnostic microbiologyinfectious diseasesintensive & critical caremicrobiologymolecular diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID37989388
PMCPMC10668237
OpenAlexW4388871176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.