Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37989367›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Communication between consultants providing advice and referring physicians: a scoping review.

Amira Muftah, James Stempien, Donna Goodridge, Erin Watson, Taofiq Oyedokun

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Direct Outreach Meetings Increase Primary Care Utilization of Psychiatry Access Programs.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amira MuftahCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada amira.muftah@usask.ca.ORCID 0009-0004-9171-4590
James StempienDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Donna GoodridgeDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Erin WatsonLeslie and Irene Dubé Health Sciences Library, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Taofiq OyedokunDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCommunication during consultations between referring and consultant physicians is often cited as a source of adverse events, medical error and professional incivility. While existing literature focuses on the role of referring physicians, few studies acknowledge the role of consultant physicians in enhancing communication during consultations. This scoping review aims to identify and synthesise available recommendations to enhance the communication practices of consultants during real-time consultations.

designA scoping review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. DATA SOURCES: Medline, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases were searched from inception to August 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: English-language publications which describe recommendations, strategies or frameworks to improve the communication practices of consultant physicians during real-time consultations with referring physicians. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The search strategy included the following concepts: consultation, physician, communication, interprofessional relations and best practice. Two authors independently performed each phase of title and abstract screening, full-text review and data extraction. Discrepancies were resolved by a third author. Extracted data were iteratively analysed and summarised thematically.

resultsSixteen publications met the inclusion criteria. Synthesis of available recommendations identified organisation, expertise and interpersonal skills as three overarching and interconnected dimensions of communication demonstrated by consultants during effective consultations. Twelve studies identified interpersonal skills as being critical in alleviating the widespread professional incivility that is reported during consultations. Existing recommendations to improve the communication practices of consultants are limited as they lack standardised interventions and fail to comprehensively address all three elements identified in this review.

conclusionThis scoping review synthesises available recommendations to improve the communication practices of consultant physicians during real-time consultations. An opportunity exists to develop communication tools or educational interventions based on the findings of this review to enhance interphysician consultation encounters.

Indexed as

ConsultantsPhysiciansCommunicationHumansLanguageReferral and Consultationeducation & training (see medical education & training)interprofessional relationsmedical education & trainingphysicians

Identifiers

PMID37989367
PMCPMC10668268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.