Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37989246›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

How density dependence, genetic erosion and the extinction vortex impact evolutionary rescue.

Scott W Nordstrom, Ruth A Hufbauer, Laure Olazcuaga, Lily F Durkee, Brett A Melbourne

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evolution fails to rescue a population in an increasingly variable environment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Scott W NordstromDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7096-8349
Ruth A HufbauerDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8270-0638
Laure OlazcuagaDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9100-1305
Lily F DurkeeDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7328-0256
Brett A MelbourneDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8843-4131
Colorado State University · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

National Science Foundation 006784National Science Foundation 114807National Science Foundation 1930222National Science Foundation 1930650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following severe environmental change that reduces mean population fitness below replacement, populations must adapt to avoid eventual extinction, a process called evolutionary rescue. Models of evolutionary rescue demonstrate that initial size, genetic variation and degree of maladaptation influence population fates. However, many models feature populations that grow without negative density dependence or with constant genetic diversity despite precipitous population decline, assumptions likely to be violated in conservation settings. We examined the simultaneous influences of density-dependent growth and erosion of genetic diversity on populations adapting to novel environmental change using stochastic, individual-based simulations. Density dependence decreased the probability of rescue and increased the probability of extinction, especially in large and initially well-adapted populations that previously have been predicted to be at low risk. Increased extinction occurred shortly following environmental change, as populations under density dependence experienced more rapid decline and reached smaller sizes. Populations that experienced evolutionary rescue lost genetic diversity through drift and adaptation, particularly under density dependence. Populations that declined to extinction entered an extinction vortex, where small size increased drift, loss of genetic diversity and the fixation of maladaptive alleles, hindered adaptation and kept populations at small densities where they were vulnerable to extinction via demographic stochasticity.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionExtinction, BiologicalAnimalsPopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsProbabilityadaptationeco-evolutionary dynamicsgenetic variationpopulation dynamics

Identifiers

PMID37989246
PMCPMC10688442
OpenAlexW4388880084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.