ArticleESMO open2023
Validation of the ALK-Brain Prognostic Index for patients with ALK-rearranged lung cancer and brain metastases.
Article in ESMO open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The brain-lung immunotherapy prognostic (BLIP) Score: a novel robust tool for prognostication in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence inCancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrain metastases (BMs) are a key challenge in the management of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ALK+ NSCLC), but prognostic scores are complicated or rely on data before the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This study aimed to validate the novel ALK-Brain Prognostic Index (ALK-BPI), which was originally proposed based on 44 TKI-treated ALK+ NSCLC patients from Karolinska University Hospital, using an external clinical cohort. PATIENTS AND
methodsTKI-treated ALK+ NSCLC patients with BM from Heidelberg (n = 82, cohort 1) were retrospectively analyzed alone and together with the original Karolinska cohort (n = 126, cohort 2). Cox regression models were used to determine the association of clinical variables and scores with overall survival (OS) after BM diagnosis (BM-related OS).
resultsBoth cohorts showed a similar median age (58 years), roughly balanced sex distributions (52%-56% females), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0-2 for most patients (87%-92%) at the time of BM development, which were present already at initial diagnosis in 36%-38% of the patients. Most patients had received next-generation ALK inhibitors (54%-63%), while 55%-56% of patients did not receive any radiotherapy. The ALK-BPI identified poor-risk patients (i.e. featuring ≥ 2/3 risk factors: PS > 2, male sex, development of BM after initial diagnosis) with a significantly shorter BM-related OS than other patients in both cohorts: 32/82 in cohort 1 with 21.3 versus 62.2 months in median [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.5, P < 0.001]; 59/126 in cohort 2 with 23.1 versus 67.2 months in median (HR = 2.6, P < 0.001). The five-parameter Lung-molGPA score did not achieve statistical significance and/or clear prognostic separation in all four groups, while the Disease-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment score did not show consistent results.
conclusionsThe ALK-BPI is a reliable tool for easy prognostic dichotomization of TKI-treated ALK+ NSCLC patients with BM in daily clinical practice, without the complexity of previous models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.