ArticlePloS one2023
Simulation of gravity- and pump-driven perfusion techniques for measuring outflow facility of ex vivo and in vivo eyes.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retinal cytoarchitecture is preserved in an organotypic perfused human and porcine eye model.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aqueous humor dynamics are commonly assessed by infusing fluid into the eye and measuring intraocular pressure (IOP). From the pressure-flow relationship, conventional outflow facility is estimated to study glaucomatous processes that lower facility or identify therapeutics that enhance facility in hopes of restoring healthy IOP levels. The relative merits and limitations of constant flow (CF), gravity-driven constant pressure (CPg), and pump-driven constant pressure (CPp) infusion techniques were explored via simulations of a lumped parameter viscoelastic model of the eye. Model parameter values were based on published perfusion system properties and outflow facility data from rodents. Step increases in pressure or flow were simulated without and with IOP noise recorded from enucleated eyes, anesthetized animals, and conscious animals. Steady-state response levels were determined using published window and ratio criteria. Model simulations show that all perfusion techniques estimate facility accurately and that ocular fluid dynamics set a hard limit on how fast measurements can be taken. This limit can be approached with CPg and CPp systems by increasing their gain but not with CF systems, which invariably take longest to settle. Facility experiment duration is further lengthened by inclusion of IOP noise, and data filtering is needed for steady-state detection with in vivo noise. The ratio criterion was particularly affected because noise in the flow data is amplified by the higher gain of CPg and CPp systems. A recursive regression method is introduced, which can ignore large transient IOP fluctuations that interfere with steady-state detection by fitting incoming data to the viscoelastic eye model. The fitting method greatly speeds up data collection without loss of accuracy, which could enable outflow facility measurements in conscious animals. The model may be generalized to study response dynamics to fluid infusion in other viscoelastic compartments of the body and model insights extended to optimize experiment design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.