Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37988366›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

The CLoCk study: A retrospective exploration of loneliness in children and young people during the COVID-19 pandemic, in England.

Kelsey McOwat, Snehal M Pinto Pereira, Manjula D Nugawela, Shamez N Ladhani, Fiona Newlands, Terence Stephenson, Ruth Simmons, Malcolm G Semple, Terry Segal, Marta Buszewicz and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kelsey McOwatImmunisations and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Department, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4170-1498
Snehal M Pinto PereiraDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0876-8757
Manjula D NugawelaUniversity College London-Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Shamez N LadhaniImmunisations and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Department, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.
Fiona NewlandsUniversity College London-Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Terence StephensonUniversity College London-Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Ruth SimmonsImmunisations and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Department, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.
Malcolm G SempleNIHR Health Protection Research Unit for Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9700-0418
Terry SegalDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescence, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Marta BuszewiczUniversity College London-Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Isobel HeymanUniversity College London-Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Trudie ChalderDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Tamsin FordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Hershel Smith Building Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Emma DalrympleUniversity College London-Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Consortium
Roz ShafranUniversity College London-Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P020372/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic children and young people (CYP) were socially restricted during a stage of life crucial to development, potentially putting an already vulnerable population at higher risk of loneliness, social isolation, and poorer wellbeing. The objectives of this study are to conduct an exploratory analysis into loneliness before and during the pandemic, and determine which self-reported factors are associated with loneliness. METHODS AND

findingsParticipants from The Children with Long COVID (CLoCk) national study were invited to take part via an online survey, with a total of 31,017 participants taking part, 31,016 of which reported on their experience of loneliness. Participants retrospectively answered questions on demographics, lifestyle, physical health and mental health and loneliness before the pandemic and at the time of answering the survey. Before the pandemic 6.5% (2,006/31,016) of participants reported experiencing loneliness "Often/Always" and at the time of survey completion 17.4% (5,395/31,016) reported feeling lonelier. There was an association between meeting the research definition of long COVID and loneliness [3.49 OR, 95%CI 3.28-3.72]. CYP who reported feeling lonelier at the time of the survey than before the pandemic were assigned female at birth, older CYP, those from Black/African/Caribbean/Black British or other ethnicity groups, those that had 3-4 siblings and lived in more deprived areas.

conclusionsWe demonstrate associations between multiple factors and experiences of loneliness during the pandemic. There is a need for a multi-faceted integrated approach when developing interventions targeted at loneliness. It is important to follow up the CYP involved at regular intervals to investigate the progression of their experience of loneliness over time.

Indexed as

COVID-19LonelinessAdolescentChildEnglandFemaleHumansPandemicsPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37988366
PMCPMC10662715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.