Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37988137›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Usability of the Experience Sampling Method in Specialized Mental Health Care: Pilot Evaluation Study.

Jeroen Dennis Merlijn Weermeijer, Martien Wampers, Lena de Thurah, Rafaël Bonnier, Maarten Piot, Peter Kuppens, Inez Myin-Germeys, Glenn Kiekens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeroen Dennis Merlijn WeermeijerCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6288-795X
Martien WampersCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0414-424X
Lena de ThurahCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6102-0767
Rafaël BonnierCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1143-0711
Maarten PiotQuantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0118-5903
Peter KuppensQuantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2363-2356
Inez Myin-GermeysCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3731-4930
Glenn KiekensCenter for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8747-3385

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health problems occur in interactions in daily life. Yet, it is challenging to bring contextual information into the therapy room. The experience sampling method (ESM) may facilitate this by assessing clients' thoughts, feelings, symptoms, and behaviors as they are experienced in everyday life. However, the ESM is still primarily used in research settings, with little uptake in clinical practice. One aspect that may facilitate clinical implementation concerns the use of ESM protocols, which involves providing practitioners with ready-to-use ESM questionnaires, sampling schemes, visualizations, and training.

objectiveThis pilot study's objective was to evaluate the usability of an ESM protocol for using the ESM in a specialized mental health care setting.

methodsWe created the ESM protocol using the m-Path software platform and tested its usability in clinical practice. The ESM protocol consists of a dashboard for practitioners (ie, including the setup of the template and data visualizations) and an app for clients (ie, for completing the ESM questionnaires). A total of 8 practitioners and 17 clients used the ESM in practice between December 1, 2020, and July 31, 2021. Usability was assessed using questionnaires, ESM compliance rates, and semistructured interviews.

resultsThe usability was overall rated reasonable to good by practitioners (mean scores of usability items ranging from 5.33, SD 0.91, to 6.06, SD 0.73, on a scale ranging from 1 to 7). However, practitioners expressed difficulty in personalizing the template and reported insufficient guidelines on how to use the ESM in clinical practice. On average, clients completed 55% (SD 25%) of the ESM questionnaires. They rated the usability as reasonable to good, but their scores were slightly lower and more variable than those of the practitioners (mean scores of usability items ranging from 4.18, SD 1.70, to 5.94, SD 1.50 on a scale ranging from 1 to 7). Clients also voiced several concerns over the piloted ESM template, with some indicating no interest in the continued use of the ESM.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that using an ESM protocol may facilitate the implementation of the ESM as a mobile health assessment tool in psychiatry. However, additional adaptions should be made before further implementation. Adaptions include providing training on personalizing questionnaires, adding additional sampling scheme formats as well as an open-text field, and creating a dynamic data visualization interface. Future studies should also identify factors determining the suitability of the ESM for specific treatment goals among different client populations.

Indexed as

digital mental healthecological momentary assessmentexperience samplingimplementationmobile phone

Identifiers

PMID37988137
PMCPMC10698657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.