Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37988073›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023

An Open-Source Deep Learning Algorithm for Efficient and Fully Automatic Analysis of the Choroid in Optical Coherence Tomography.

Jamie Burke, Justin Engelmann, Charlene Hamid, Megan Reid-Schachter, Tom Pearson, Dan Pugh, Neeraj Dhaun, Amos Storkey, Stuart King, Tom J MacGillivray and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jamie BurkeSchool of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Justin EngelmannSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Charlene HamidClinical Research Facility and Imaging, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Megan Reid-SchachterClinical Research Facility and Imaging, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Tom PearsonUniversity Hospital Wales, NHS Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Dan PughBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Neeraj DhaunBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Amos StorkeyInstitute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Stuart KingSchool of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Tom J MacGillivrayClinical Research Facility and Imaging, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Miguel O BernabeuCentre for Medical Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Ian J C MacCormickInstitute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBBritish Heart Foundation · GBCentre for Inflammation Research · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop an open-source, fully automatic deep learning algorithm, DeepGPET, for choroid region segmentation in optical coherence tomography (OCT) data. Methods: We used a dataset of 715 OCT B-scans (82 subjects, 115 eyes) from three clinical studies related to systemic disease. Ground-truth segmentations were generated using a clinically validated, semiautomatic choroid segmentation method, Gaussian Process Edge Tracing (GPET). We finetuned a U-Net with the MobileNetV3 backbone pretrained on ImageNet. Standard segmentation agreement metrics, as well as derived measures of choroidal thickness and area, were used to evaluate DeepGPET, alongside qualitative evaluation from a clinical ophthalmologist. Results: DeepGPET achieved excellent agreement with GPET on data from three clinical studies (AUC = 0.9994, Dice = 0.9664; Pearson correlation = 0.8908 for choroidal thickness and 0.9082 for choroidal area), while reducing the mean processing time per image on a standard laptop CPU from 34.49 ± 15.09 seconds using GPET to 1.25 ± 0.10 seconds using DeepGPET. Both methods performed similarly according to a clinical ophthalmologist who qualitatively judged a subset of segmentations by GPET and DeepGPET, based on smoothness and accuracy of segmentations. Conclusions: DeepGPET, a fully automatic, open-source algorithm for choroidal segmentation, will enable researchers to efficiently extract choroidal measurements, even for large datasets. As no manual interventions are required, DeepGPET is less subjective than semiautomatic methods and could be deployed in clinical practice without requiring a trained operator. Translational Relevance: DeepGPET addresses the lack of open-source, fully automatic, and clinically relevant choroid segmentation algorithms, and its subsequent public release will facilitate future choroidal research in both ophthalmology and wider systemic health.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOphthalmologistsAlgorithmsChoroidHumansTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID37988073
PMCPMC10668622
OpenAlexW4388860969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.