Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37987924›Full record

ReviewHuman cell2024

Hypoxia and interleukin-1-primed mesenchymal stem/stromal cells as novel therapy for stroke.

Maryam Adenike Salaudeen, Stuart Allan, Emmanuel Pinteaux

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human cell, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maryam Adenike SalaudeenFaculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Division of Neuroscience, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4066-7937
Stuart AllanFaculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Division of Neuroscience, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9646-4456
Emmanuel PinteauxFaculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Division of Neuroscience, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Emmanuel.pinteaux@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9986-4401
Ahmadu Bello University · NGManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Promising preclinical stroke research has not yielded meaningful and significant success in clinical trials. This lack of success has prompted the need for refinement of preclinical studies with the intent to optimize the chances of clinical success. Regenerative medicine, especially using mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs), has gained popularity in the last decade for treating many disorders, including central nervous system (CNS), such as stroke. In addition to less stringent ethical constraints, the ample availability of MSCs also makes them an attractive alternative to totipotent and other pluripotent stem cells. The ability of MSCs to differentiate into neurons and other brain parenchymal and immune cells makes them a promising therapy for stroke. However, these cells also have some drawbacks that, if not addressed, will render MSCs unfit for treating ischaemic stroke. In this review, we highlighted the molecular and cellular changes that occur following an ischaemic stroke (IS) incidence and discussed the physiological properties of MSCs suitable for tackling these changes. We also went further to discuss the major drawbacks of utilizing MSCs in IS and how adequate priming using both hypoxia and interleukin-1 can optimize the beneficial properties of MSCs while eliminating these drawbacks.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaIschemic StrokeMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationStrokeHumansHypoxiaInterleukin-1Interleukin-1HypoxiaIschemiaMesenchymal stem/stromal cellPrimingStroke

Identifiers

PMID37987924
PMCPMC10764391
OpenAlexW4388852642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.