Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37987874›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2023

Parametric and non-parametric Poisson regression for modelling of the arterial input function in positron emission tomography.

Granville J Matheson, Liner Ge, Mengyu Zhang, Bingyu Sun, Yuqi Tu, Francesca Zanderigo, Anton Forsberg Morèn, R Todd Ogden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Granville J MathesonDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, 10032, USA. granville.matheson@nyspi.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5646-4547
Liner GeDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Mengyu ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Bingyu SunDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Yuqi TuDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Francesca ZanderigoDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Anton Forsberg MorènDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden.
R Todd OgdenDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Columbia University · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USStockholm County Council · SEUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Suicidal Behavior: Aggression Subtypes, Childhood Adversity and Stress ResponseP50MH090964 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI OCHSNER, KEVIN N · 2013 to 2022
$23.6M
Advanced Modeling Techniques for Brain Imaging Data with PETR01EB024526 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI OGDEN, TODD · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB024526NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH090964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Full quantification of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) requires an arterial input function (AIF) for measurement of certain targets, or using particular radiotracers, or for the quantification of specific outcome measures. The AIF represents the measurement of radiotracer concentrations in the arterial blood plasma over the course of the PET examination. Measurement of the AIF is prone to error as it is a composite measure created from the combination of multiple measurements of different samples with different equipment, each of which can be sources of measurement error. Moreover, its measurement requires a high degree of temporal granularity for early time points, which necessitates a compromise between quality and quantity of recorded samples. For these reasons, it is often desirable to fit models to this data in order to improve its quality before using it for quantification of radiotracer binding in the tissue. The raw observations of radioactivity in arterial blood and plasma samples are derived from radioactive decay, which is measured as a number of recorded counts. Count data have several specific properties, including the fact that they cannot be negative as well as a particular mean-variance relationship. Poisson regression is the most principled modelling strategy for working with count data, as it both incorporates and exploits these properties. However, no previous studies to our knowledge have taken this approach, despite the advantages of greater efficiency and accuracy which result from using the appropriate distributional assumptions. Here, we implement a Poisson regression modelling approach for the AIF as proof-of-concept of its application. We applied both parametric and non-parametric models for the input function curve. We show that a negative binomial distribution is a more appropriate error distribution for handling overdispersion. Furthermore, we extend this approach to a hierarchical non-parametric model which is shown to be highly resilient to missing data. We thus demonstrate that Poisson regression is both feasible and effective when applied to AIF data, and propose that this is a promising strategy for modelling blood count data for PET in future.

Indexed as

Arterial input functionPositron emission tomographyPrincipled statistical modelling

Identifiers

PMID37987874
PMCPMC10663416
OpenAlexW4388849443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.