Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37987783›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024

Multicentric development and evaluation of [

François Lucia, Thomas Louis, François Cousin, Vincent Bourbonne, Dimitris Visvikis, Carole Mievis, Nicolas Jansen, Bernard Duysinx, Romain Le Pennec, Malik Nebbache and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Clinical study ofPeerJ · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. IntegratingBMC cancer · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multicentric development and evaluation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

François Lucia *Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France. francois.lucia@chu-brest.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7286-1350
Thomas Louis *Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
François CousinDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Vincent BourbonneRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Dimitris VisvikisLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, Univ Brest, Brest, France.
Carole MievisDepartment of Radiotherapy Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Nicolas JansenDepartment of Radiotherapy Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Bernard DuysinxDivision of Pulmonology, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Romain Le PennecNuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Malik NebbacheRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Martin RehnRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Mohamed HamyaRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Margaux GeierMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Pierre-Yves SalaunNuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Ulrike SchickRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Mathieu HattLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, Univ Brest, Brest, France.
Philippe CouckeDepartment of Radiotherapy Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Roland Hustinx *Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Pierre Lovinfosse *Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Inserm · FRUniversity of Liège · BECentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop machine learning models to predict regional and/or distant recurrence in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using [

methodsWe retrospectively collected 464 patients (60% for training and 40% for testing) from University Hospital of Liège and 63 patients from University Hospital of Brest (external testing set) with ES-NSCLC treated with SBRT between 2010 and 2020 and who had undergone pretreatment [

resultsIn the training (n = 273) and testing sets (n = 191 and n = 63), the clinical model achieved moderate performances to predict regional and/or distant recurrence with C-statistics from 0.53 to 0.59 (95% CI, 0.41, 0.67). The radiomic (original_firstorder_Entropy, original_gldm_LowGrayLevelEmphasis and original_glcm_DifferenceAverage) model achieved higher predictive ability in the training set and kept the same performance in the testing sets, with C-statistics from 0.70 to 0.78 (95% CI, 0.63, 0.88) while the combined model performs moderately well with C-statistics from 0.50 to 0.62 (95% CI, 0.37, 0.69).

conclusionRadiomic features extracted from pre-SBRT analog and digital [

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsRadiosurgerySmall Cell Lung CarcinomaFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18[18F]FDG PET/CTMachine learningNon-small cell lung cancerRadiomicsStereotactic body radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID37987783
OpenAlexW4388845705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.