Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37987578›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

The shared and unique neural correlates of personal semantic, general semantic, and episodic memory.

Annick F N Tanguay, Daniela J Palombo, Brittany Love, Rafael Glikstein, Patrick S R Davidson, Louis Renoult

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The properties of personal semantics.Memory & cognition · 2026
    Article
  3. What episodic memory reveals about the default mode network.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Concept Cells and the Neural Bases of Human Memory.Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Distinct mechanisms and functions of episodic memory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Constructive Memory and Conscious Experience.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annick F N TanguaySchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6964-3077
Daniela J PalomboDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Brittany LoveSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Rafael GliksteinSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Patrick S R DavidsonSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Louis RenoultSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7861-0552

Funding

British Academy SG142524Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2019-04596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most common distinctions in long-term memory is that between semantic (i.e., general world knowledge) and episodic (i.e., recollection of contextually specific events from one's past). However, emerging cognitive neuroscience data suggest a surprisingly large overlap between the neural correlates of semantic and episodic memory. Moreover, personal semantic memories (i.e., knowledge about the self and one's life) have been studied little and do not easily fit into the standard semantic-episodic dichotomy. Here, we used fMRI to record brain activity while 48 participants verified statements concerning general facts, autobiographical facts, repeated events, and unique events. In multivariate analysis, all four types of memory involved activity within a common network bilaterally (e.g., frontal pole, paracingulate gyrus, medial frontal cortex, middle/superior temporal gyrus, precuneus, posterior cingulate, angular gyrus) and some areas of the medial temporal lobe. Yet the four memory types differentially engaged this network, increasing in activity from general to autobiographical facts, from autobiographical facts to repeated events, and from repeated to unique events. Our data are compatible with a component process model, in which declarative memory types rely on different weightings of the same elementary processes, such as perceptual imagery, spatial features, and self-reflection.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicSemanticsBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMental RecallParietal LobeTemporal Lobedeclarative memoryepisodic memoryfMRIhumanneurosciencepersonal semanticssemantic memory

Identifiers

PMID37987578
PMCPMC10662951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.