Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37987428›Full record

ReviewClinics and practice2023

Breast Cancer and Fertility Preservation in Young Female Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Ioannis Boutas, Adamantia Kontogeorgi, Nektarios Koufopoulos, Dionysios T Dimas, Kyparissia Sitara, Sophia N Kalantaridou, Constantine Dimitrakakis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ioannis BoutasBreast Unit, Rea Maternity Hospital, P. Faliro, 17564 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3667-4520
Adamantia KontogeorgiThird Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462 Chaidari, Greece.
Nektarios KoufopoulosSecond Pathology Department, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462 Chaidari, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9502-7916
Dionysios T DimasBreast Unit, Athens Medical Center, Psychiko Clinic, 11525 Athens, Greece.
Kyparissia SitaraDepartment of Internal Medicine, "Elpis" General Hospital, 11522 Athens, Greece.
Sophia N KalantaridouThird Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462 Chaidari, Greece.
Constantine DimitrakakisFirst Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou 4-2, 11528 Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRAthens Medical Center · GRGeneral Hospital of Athens Elpis · GRLETO Maternity Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast cancer affects almost 1.5 million women worldwide below the age of 45 years each year. Many of these women will be advised to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy to minimize the risk of death or recurrence of the tumor. For these patients, chemotherapy is a known cause of infertility, as it can damage primordial follicles, which can lead to early menopause or premature ovarian insufficiency. This systematic review aims to synthesize the current evidence of the most suitable treatments for fertility preservation. METHODOLOGY: This review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. The authors conducted an extensive search from the last 15 years. Relevant studies were pursued in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up until 31 July 2023. A total of seven eligible studies were identified.

resultsFrom the reviewed literature, ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists showed promising results in preserving fertility for breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Additionally, oocyte and embryo cryopreservation demonstrated successful outcomes, with embryo cryopreservation being the most effective option. Notably, the slow-freezing and vitrification methods were both effective in preserving embryos, with vitrification showing superior results in clinical-assisted reproductive technologies. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation emerged as a viable option for prepubertal girls and those unable to undergo conventional ovarian stimulation. The potential of in vitro maturation (IVM) as an alternative method presents a promising avenue for future fertility preservation research. DISCUSSION: The most suitable treatments for fertility preservation in young patients is the temporary suppression with luteinizing hormone-releasing analogs, while the patient undergoes chemotherapy and cryopreservation. For cryopreservation, the physicians might deem it necessary to either cryopreserve ovarian tissue taken from the patient before any treatment or cryopreserve embryos/oocytes. Cryopreservation of oocytes and/or embryos is the most effective solution for fertility preservation in women of reproductive age, who have a sufficient ovarian reserve and are diagnosed with breast cancer, regardless of the histological type of the tumor. Because approximately 50% of young breast cancer patients are interested in becoming pregnant right after completion of therapy, the evolution and development of fertility preservation techniques promise to be very exciting.

Indexed as

breast cancercryopreservationfertility preservationGNRH analogs

Identifiers

PMID37987428
PMCPMC10660549
OpenAlexW4388651895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.