Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37987422›Full record

ArticleClinics and practice2023

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Polish Version of the Neck Outcome Score.

Nicola Dyrek, Łukasz Pulik, Aleksandra Piwowarczyk, Wiktoria Skała, Nina Grabowska-Mycko, Paweł Łęgosz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicola DyrekStudent Scientific Association of Reconstructive and Oncology Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland.
Łukasz PulikDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Lindley 4 Str., 02-005 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4953-0075
Aleksandra PiwowarczykStudent Scientific Association of Reconstructive and Oncology Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland.
Wiktoria SkałaStudent Scientific Association of Reconstructive and Oncology Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland.
Nina Grabowska-MyckoDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Lindley 4 Str., 02-005 Warsaw, Poland.
Paweł ŁęgoszDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Lindley 4 Str., 02-005 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9799-5750
Medical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to translate and psychometrically validate the Neck Outcome Score (NOOS) in the Polish population according to the recommendations of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Participants completed online version of the NOOS, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain assessment (23 November 2021-9 April 2022). The questionnaires were completed by 57 women and 32 men with cervical spine ailments. A retest was performed after 48 h. The analysis confirmed the high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.95) of the Polish NOOS. No floor/ceiling effects were observed. The Polish NOOS showed a significant Spearman's coefficient correlation with NDI (0.87;

Indexed as

cervical painpatient-reported outcome measurePolandvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID37987422
PMCPMC10660527
OpenAlexW4388104391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.