ReviewTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2023
High-Riding Conus Medullaris Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review-Its Comparison with Cauda Equina Syndrome.
Review in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionConus medullaris syndrome (CMS) is a distinctive spinal cord injury (SCI), which presents with varying degrees of upper motor neuron signs (UMNS) and lower motor neuron signs (LMNS). Herein, we present a case with a burst fracture injury at the proximal Conus Medullaris (CM). CASE PRESENTATION: A 48-year-old Taiwanese male presenting with lower back pain and paraparesis was having difficulty standing independently after a traumatic fall. An Imaging survey showed an incomplete D burst fracture of the T12 vertebra. Posterior decompression surgery was subsequently performed. However, spasticity and back pain persisted for four months after surgical intervention. Follow-up imaging with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and a whole body bone scan both showed an increased uptake in the T12 vertebra.
conclusionThe high-riding injury site for CMS is related to a more exclusive clinical representation of UMNS. Our case's persistent UMNS and scintigraphy findings during follow-up showcase the prolonged recovery period of a UMN injury. In conclusion, our study provides a different perspective on approaching follow-up for CM injuries, namely using scientigraphy techniques to confirm localization of persistent injury during the course of post-operative rehabilitation. Furthermore, we also offered a new technique for analyzing the location of lumbosacral injuries, and that is to measure the location of the injury relative to the tip of the CM. This, along with clinical neurological examination, assesses the extent to which the UMN is involved in patients with CMS, and is possibly a notable predictive tool for clinicians for the regeneration time frame and functional outcome of patients with lumbosacral injuries in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.