Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37987300›Full record

ReviewAdvances in respiratory medicine2023

E-Cigarettes and Associated Health Risks: An Update on Cancer Potential.

Rakesh Sahu, Kamal Shah, Rishabha Malviya, Deepika Paliwal, Sakshi Sagar, Sudarshan Singh, Bhupendra G Prajapati, Sankha Bhattacharya

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in respiratory medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The impact of smoking on lung cancer patients.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rakesh SahuDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Medical and Allied Sciences, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2500-9277
Kamal ShahDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2389-0563
Rishabha MalviyaDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Medical and Allied Sciences, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, India.
Deepika PaliwalDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Medical and Allied Sciences, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, India.
Sakshi SagarDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Medical and Allied Sciences, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, India.
Sudarshan SinghDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7929-3322
Bhupendra G PrajapatiShree S. K. Patel College of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Ganpat University, Kherva 384012, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8242-4541
Sankha BhattacharyaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy & Technology Management, SVKM'S NMIMS Deemed-to-Be University, Shirpur 425405, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0771-9582
Galgotias University · INChiang Mai University · THGanpat University · INGLA University · INNarsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential cancer risk associated with electronic-cigarette (e-cigarette) use is ongoing and remains a subject of debate. E-Cigarettes work by heating a liquid that usually contains nicotine, flavorings, and other chemicals. When the liquid is heated, users inhale an aerosol into their lungs. While e-cigarettes are generally considered less harmful than traditional tobacco products, they still contain potentially harmful chemicals, which can damage DNA and lead to cancer. Several studies have investigated the potential cancer risk associated with e-cigarette use, while other studies have suggested that e-cigarette aerosol may contain carcinogenic chemicals that could increase the risk of lung and bladder cancer in humans. However, these studies are limited in their scope and do not provide conclusive evidence. Overall, the long-term cancer risk associated with e-cigarette use remains uncertain, more research is needed to fully understand the potential risks and benefits of e-cigarettes. However, this review will allow the investigator to get more recent updates about e-cigarettes.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsVapingAerosolsHumansNicotineAerosolsNicotinecancerchemicals in e-cigarettee-cigaretteflavors of e-cigarettegeneration of e-cigarette

Identifiers

PMID37987300
PMCPMC10660480
OpenAlexW4388653198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.