Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37987022›Full record

ArticleNutrition today

An Overlap Between "Ultraprocessed" Foods and the Preexisting Nutrient Rich Foods Index?

Adam Drewnowski, Shilpi Gupta, Nicole Darmon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition today. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ultra-processed foods: how functional is the NOVA system?European journal of clinical nutrition · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam DrewnowskiCenter for Public Health Nutrition, University of Washington, Box 353410, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Shilpi GuptaCenter for Public Health Nutrition, University of Washington, Box 353410, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Nicole DarmonMOISA, INRA, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, CIHEAM-IAMM, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Food Environment, Diet Quality and Disparities in ObesityR01DK076608 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DREWNOWSKI, ADAM · 2008 to 2019
$6.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK076608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The category of "ultra-processed" foods in the NOVA food classification scheme is ostensibly based on industrial processing. We compared NOVA category assignments with the pre-existing family of Nutrient Rich Food (NRF) indices, first developed in 2005. NRF

Indexed as

energy densityFood frequency questionnaire (FFQ)NOVA classificationnutrient densityultra-processed foods

Identifiers

PMID37987022
PMCPMC10659579
OpenAlexW3014210266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.