ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Intrinsic forebrain arousal dynamics governs sensory stimulus encoding.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The neural encoding of sensory stimuli is subject to the brain's internal circuit dynamics. Recent work has demonstrated that the resting brain exhibits widespread, coordinated activity that plays out over multisecond timescales in the form of quasi-periodic spiking cascades. Here we demonstrate that these intrinsic dynamics persist during the presentation of visual stimuli and markedly influence the efficacy of feature encoding in the visual cortex. During periods of passive viewing, the sensory encoding of visual stimuli was determined by quasi-periodic cascade cycle evolving over several seconds. During this cycle, high efficiency encoding occurred during peak arousal states, alternating in time with hippocampal ripples, which were most frequent in low arousal states. However, during bouts of active locomotion, these arousal dynamics were abolished: the brain remained in a state in which visual coding efficiency remained high and ripples were absent. We hypothesize that the brain's observed dynamics during awake, passive viewing reflect an adaptive cycle of alternating exteroceptive sensory sampling and internal mnemonic function.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.