Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37986766›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Both mOTS-words and pOTS-words prefer emoji stimuli over text stimuli during a reading task.

Alexia Dalski, Holly Kular, Julia G Jorgensen, Kalanit Grill-Spector, Mareike Grotheer

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexia DalskiDepartment of Psychology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg 35039, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7993-2078
Holly KularDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Julia G JorgensenDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Kalanit Grill-SpectorDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Mareike GrotheerDepartment of Psychology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg 35039, Germany.

Funding

Visual Cortex as a Window to Microstructural and Functional Development of the Human BrainR01EY033835 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GRILL-SPECTOR, KALANIT, PAREDES, MERCEDES · 2022 to 2025
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual word form area in the occipitotemporal sulcus (OTS), here referred to as OTS-words, responds more strongly to text than other visual stimuli and is crucial for reading. We hypothesized, that this text preference may be driven by a preference for reading tasks, as in most prior fMRI studies only the text stimuli were readable. Hence, we performed three fMRI experiments (N=15) and systematically varied the participant's task and the stimulus, investigating mOTS-words and pOTS-words subregions. In experiment 1, we contrasted text stimuli with non-readable visual stimuli (faces, limbs, houses, objects). Experiment 2 utilized an fMRI adaptation paradigm, presenting compound words in text or emoji formats. In experiment 3, participants performed a reading or a color task on compound words in text or emoji format. Using experiment 1 data, we identified mOTS-words and pOTS-words by contrasting texts with non-readable stimuli. In experiment 2, pOTS-words, but not mOTS-words, showed fMRI adaptation for compound words in both text and emoji formats. In experiment 3, surprisingly, both subregions showed higher responses to compound words in emoji than text format. Moreover, mOTS-words showed higher responses during the reading than the color task and a task-stimulus interaction. Multivariate analyses revealed that distributed responses in pOTS-words encode the visual stimulus, while responses in mOTS-words encode both stimulus and task. Together, our findings suggest that the function of the OTS-words subregions goes beyond the specific visual processing of text and that these regions are flexibly recruited whenever semantic meaning needs to be assigned to visual input.

Identifiers

PMID37986766
PMCPMC10659328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.