Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37986715›Full record

ArticleSustainable production and consumption2023

Multi-scale techno-economic assessment of nitrogen recovery systems for livestock operations.

Edgar Martín-Hernández, Clara Montero-Rueda, Gerardo J Ruiz-Mercado, Céline Vaneeckhaute, Mariano Martín

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sustainable production and consumption, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Edgar Martín-HernándezDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Salamanca, Plza. Caídos 1-5, 37008 Salamanca, Spain.
Clara Montero-RuedaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Salamanca, Plza. Caídos 1-5, 37008 Salamanca, Spain.
Gerardo J Ruiz-MercadoCenter for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response (CESER), US Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Céline VaneeckhauteBioEngine - Research Team on Green Process Engineering and Biorefineries, Chemical Engineering Department, Université Laval, 1065 Ave. de la Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Mariano MartínDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Salamanca, Plza. Caídos 1-5, 37008 Salamanca, Spain.
Universidad de Salamanca · ESOhio Environmental Protection Agency · USUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensive livestock farming generates vast amounts of organic materials, which are an important source of nitrogen releases. These anthropogenic nitrogen releases contribute to multiple environmental problems, including eutrophication of water systems, contamination of drinking water sources, and greenhouse gas emissions. Nitrogen recovery and recycling are technically feasible, and there exists a number of processes for nitrogen recovery from livestock material in the form of different products. In this work, a multi-scale techno-economic assessment of techniques for nitrogen recovery and recycling is performed. The assessment includes a material flow analysis of each process, from material collection to final treatment, to determine nitrogen recovery efficiency, losses, and recovery cost, as well as an environmental cost-benefit analysis to compare the nitrogen recovery cost versus the economic losses derived from its uncontrolled release into the environment. The results show that transmembrane chemisorption process results in the lowest recovery cost, 3.4-10.4 USD per kilogram of nitrogen recovered in the range of studied processing scales. The recovery of nitrogen from livestock material through three technologies, i.e., transmembrane chemisorption, MAPHEX, and stripping in packed bed, reveales to be cost-effective. Since the economic losses due to the harmful effects of nitrogen into the environment are estimated at 32-35 USD per kilogram of nitrogen released, nitrogen recycling is an environmentally and economically beneficial approach to reduce nutrient pollution caused by livestock operations.

Indexed as

Livestock industryNitrogen recoveryNutrient pollutionOrganic materialTechno-economic assessment

Identifiers

PMID37986715
PMCPMC10659086
OpenAlexW4385431704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.