Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37986179›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurodegeneration2023

Alzheimer's genes in microglia: a risk worth investigating.

Ari Sudwarts, Gopal Thinakaran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Where and how do mammalian cells shape autophagosomes?The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Integrative genomic and functional analyses reveal NINL as a modulator of tau aggregation.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ari SudwartsByrd Alzheimer's Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA. asudwarts@usf.edu.
Gopal ThinakaranByrd Alzheimer's Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33613, USA. thinakaran@usf.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5523-6780

Funding

The role of elevated BIN1 expression in Alzheimer's diseaseRF1AG056061 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI THINAKARAN, GOPAL · 2018 to 2018
$3.7M
Modeling Alzheimer's disease genetic variants in hiPSCR01AG063175 · NIA · ENDEAVOR HEALTH CLINICAL OPERATIONS · PI DUAN, JUBAO, THINAKARAN, GOPAL · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
Microglial function of GWAS risk factor BIN1 in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis and inflammatory signalingRF1AG079141 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI RANGARAJU, SRIKANT, THINAKARAN, GOPAL · 2022 to 2022
$2.3M
The role of Alzheimer's disease GWAS risk factor BIN1 in tau neuropathology and propagation in vivoRF1AG077610 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI THINAKARAN, GOPAL · 2022 to 2022
$2.2M
Microglial function of GWAS risk factor BIN1 in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis and inflammatory signalingR01AG079141 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI Srikant Rangaraju, GOPAL THINAKARAN · 2025 to 2026
$1.4M
The role of Alzheimer's disease GWAS risk factor BIN1 in tau neuropathology and propagation in vivoR01AG077610 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI GOPAL THINAKARAN · 2025 to 2026
$1.4M
RETIREMENT AND MARITAL QUALITYR01AG005661 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI EKERDT, DAVID J · 1985 to 1987
–
NIA NIH HHS AG0077610NIA NIH HHS AG05661NIA NIH HHS AG063175NIA NIH HHS AG079141NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063175NIA NIH HHS R01 AG077610NIA NIH HHS R01 AG079141NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG056061NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG077610NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG079141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite expressing many key risk genes, the role of microglia in late-onset Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology is somewhat ambiguous, with various phenotypes reported to be either harmful or protective. Herein, we review some key findings from clinical and animal model investigations, discussing the role of microglial genetics in mediating perturbations from homeostasis. We note that impairment to protective phenotypes may include prolonged or insufficient microglial activation, resulting in dysregulated metabolomic (notably lipid-related) processes, compounded by age-related inflexibility in dynamic responses. Insufficiencies of mouse genetics and aggressive transgenic modelling imply severe limitations in applying current methodologies for aetiological investigations. Despite the shortcomings, widely used amyloidosis and tauopathy models of the disease have proven invaluable in dissecting microglial functional responses to AD pathophysiology. Some recent advances have brought modelling tools closer to human genetics, increasing the validity of both aetiological and translational endeavours.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloidosisAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceMice, TransgenicMicroglia

Identifiers

PMID37986179
PMCPMC10662636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.