Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37986100›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2023

The optimal dose of mobilisation therapy in the ICU: a prospective cohort study.

Marco Lorenz, Kristina Fuest, Bernhard Ulm, Julius J Grunow, Linus Warner, Annika Bald, Vanessa Arsene, Michael Verfuß, Nils Daum, Manfred Blobner and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03666286 (Prospective Registry of Mobilization-, Routine- and Outcome Data of Intensive Care Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03666286 terminatednot on this map

Prospective Registry of Mobilization-, Routine- and Outcome Data of Intensive Care Patients

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorTechnical University of MunichRan2017 to 2022Enrolled1,172ConditionsCritical Care, Rehabilitation, Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marco LorenzTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Kristina FuestTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Bernhard UlmTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Julius J GrunowCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Linus WarnerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Annika BaldCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Vanessa ArseneCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Michael VerfußCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Nils DaumCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Manfred BlobnerTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Stefan J SchallerTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Munich, Germany. s.schaller@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6683-9584
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to assess the impact of duration of early mobilisation on survivors of critical illness. The hypothesis was that interventions lasting over 40 min, as per the German guideline, positively affect the functional status at ICU discharge.

methodsProspective single-centre cohort study conducted in two ICUs in Germany. In 684 critically ill patients surviving an ICU stay > 24 h, out-of-bed mobilisation of more than 40 min was evaluated.

resultsDaily mobilisation ≥ 40 min was identified as an independent predictor of an improved functional status upon ICU discharge. This effect on the primary outcome measure, change of Mobility-Barthel until ICU discharge, was observed in three different models for baseline patient characteristics (average treatment effect (ATE), all three models p < 0.001). When mobilisation parameters like level of mobilisation, were included in the analysis, the average treatment effect disappeared [ATE 1.0 (95% CI - 0.4 to 2.4), p = 0.16].

conclusionsA mobilisation duration of more than 40 min positively impacts functional outcomes at ICU discharge. However, the maximum level achieved during ICU stay was the most crucial factor regarding adequate dosage, as higher duration did not show an additional benefit in patients with already high mobilisation levels.

trial registrationProspective Registry of Mobilization-, Routine- and Outcome Data of Intensive Care Patients (MOBDB), NCT03666286. Registered 11 September 2018-retrospectively registered, https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT03666286 .

Indexed as

Early mobilisationFunctional statusICUMobilisationPhysical therapy modalities

Identifiers

PMID37986100
PMCPMC10658796
OpenAlexW4388843812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.