Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37986090›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2023

Efficacy of ultrasound versus short wave diathermy in the treatment of chronic low back pain in patients with lumbar disk herniation: a prospective randomized control study.

Selin Ozen, Sukran Guzel, Huma Boluk Senlikci, Sacide Nur Saracgil Cosar, Ebru Selin Selcuk

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03835182 (Efficacy of Ultrasound Versus Short Wave Diathermy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03835182 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of Ultrasound Versus Short Wave Diathermy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Randomised Control Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaskent UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled82ConditionsRadiculopathy, Low Back Pain, Mechanical, Herniated Disk LumbarArmsUltrasound group, Short wave diathermy group, Control group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Selin OzenFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey. selinhassan@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7290-8558
Sukran GuzelAnkara Etlik City Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9852-0917
Huma Boluk SenlikciAnkara City Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6771-3265
Sacide Nur Saracgil CosarFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8306-463X
Ebru Selin SelcukDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dr.Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2796-6054
Başkent University · TRMemorial Ankara Hospital · TRAnkara Onkoloji Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLumbar disk herniation (LDH) is a cause of chronic low back pain (CLBP) treated using physical therapy (PT), including exercise and physical modalities such as ultrasound (US) and short wave diathermy (SWD). Despite the use of US and SWD, there is inconclusive evidence on their efficacy. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of US and SWD in the treatment of CLBP in patients with LDH.

methodsA prospective randomized control clinical study. Individuals with radicular CLBP and LDH on magnetic resonance imaging, presenting to the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Department were randomized into 3 treatment groups. All participants received 10 sessions of hotpack, transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TENS) and therapeutic exercises. In addition, Group 1 received 10 sessions of therapeutic US (1 MHz, 1.5W/cm2, 10 min), Group 2 SWD (27.12 MHz, wavelength 11.06 m, induction technique, 20 min) to the lower back. Group 3 (control group) received hotpack, TENS and therapeutic exercises alone. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for LBP, Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI) and Short Form 36 (SF-36) were evaluated pre and post treatment and at one and three months follow up.

resultsIn all groups, VAS for LBP and MODI improved with treatment and at the one and three month follow up (p < 0.001). In Groups 1 and 2, MODI scores continued to reduce at 1 and 3 months (p < 0.001 and p = 0.012 respectively). SF-36 physical, social function and pain parameters reduced in all groups (p < 0.05). Role limitation due to physical and emotional problems, emotional well-being, vitality and mental health improved in Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05).

conclusionsDeep heating agents can be used as part of the physical therapy for CLBP in those with LDH with positive mid-term effects.

trial registrationNCT03835182, 02/04/2019.

Indexed as

DiathermyLow back painPhysical therapy modalitiesPhysical therapy specialtyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID37986090
PMCPMC10658980
OpenAlexW4388827818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.