Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37986011›Full record

ReviewChinese medicine2023

Comparative efficacy of Chinese patent medicines in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a Bayesian network meta- analysis.

Wenquan Su, Xiaolong Xie, Jiping Zhao, Qinhua Fan, Naijia Dong, Qingxiao Li, Yawei Du, Shengxian Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chinese medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wenquan Su *Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
Xiaolong Xie *Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
Jiping ZhaoDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
Qinhua FanDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
Naijia DongDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
Qingxiao LiDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.
Yawei DuDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China. yaweidu@hotmail.com.
Shengxian WuDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China. shengxianwu@126.com.
Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82174340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional Chinese patent medicines (TCPMs) have been widely used to treat carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP) in China. However, systematic evaluation of the clinical efficacy of TCPMs for CAP is still unknown, and the comparative efficacy of different TCPMs is unclear.

objectivesThis study aims to compare and rank the effectiveness and safety of different TCPMs in treating CAP using a Bayesian network meta- analysis (NMA).

methodsThis NMA was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) Extension Statement. Eight databases were searched from their inception to August 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The articles regarding eligibility and extracted data were screened independently by two authors. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to evaluate quality and bias. The change of carotid artery intimal- medial thickness (IMT), carotid maximal plaque area, carotid atherosclerotic plaque Course score, serum lipid levels, CRP, and adverse events rate (AER) were used as outcomes. Data from each RCTs were first pooled using random- effect pairwise meta- analyses and illustrated as odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). NMAs were performed using Stata17.0 software and the GeMTC package of R software to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of TCPMs, and displayed as ORs or SMDs with 95% CI. A Bayesian hierarchical random- effects model was used to conduct NMAs using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm. The GRADE partially contextualised framework was applied for NMA result interpretation.

resultsNMA included 27 RCT trials with 4131 patients and nine types of TCPMs. Pairwise meta- analyses indicated that Conventional Western medicine (CWM) + TCPM was superior to CWM in reducing the IMT (SMD: - 1.26; 95% CI - 1.59 to - 0.93), the carotid maximal plaque area (SMD - 1.27; 95% CI - 1.71, - 0.82) and the carotid atherosclerotic plaque Course score (SMD - 0.72; 95% CI 95% CI - 1.20, - 0.25). NMAs demonstrated that CWM + Jiangzhiling pill (JZL) with SUCRA 70.6% exhibited the highest effective intervention for reducing IMT. CWM + SXBX (Shexiang baoxin pill) was superior to other TCPMs in reducing the carotid maximal plaque area (83.0%), the atherosclerotic plaque Course score (92.5%), TC (95.6%) and LDL (92.6%) levels. CWM + NXT (Naoxintong capsule), CWM + XS (Xiaoshuang granules/enteric capsule), and CWM + ZBT (Zhibitai) were superior to other CPMs in improving TG (90.1%), HDL (86.1%), and CRP (92.6%), respectively. No serious adverse events were reported.

conclusionsFor CAP patients, CWM + XSBX was among the most effective in reducing carotid maximal plaque area, atherosclerotic plaque Course score, TC and LDL levels, and CWM + JZL was the most effective in reducing IMT. Overall, CWM + XSBX may be considered an effective intervention for the treatment of CAP. This study provides reference and evidence for the clinical optimization of TCPM selection in CAP treatment. More adequately powered, well- designed clinical trials to increase the quality of the available evidence are still needed in the future due to several limitations.

Indexed as

Carotid atherosclerotic plaqueChinese patent medicinesNetwork meta-analysisRandomized controlled trialsTraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID37986011
PMCPMC10662928
OpenAlexW4388819623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.