ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2023
YoDe-Segmentation: automated noise-free retrieval of molecular structures from scientific publications.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organic Chemistry as a Catalyst for AI Innovation: Challenges, Methods, and Emerging Paradigms.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- AI-driven drug-target interaction prediction: current progress, challenges, and future roadmap for precision medicine.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- RGReco: a unified framework for automated R-group recognition in chemical publications.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Interpretable drug-target affinity prediction based on pre-trained models' output as embeddings and based on structure-aware cross-attention for feature fusion.Molecular diversity · 2025Article
- PatCID: an open-access dataset of chemical structures in patent documents.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In chemistry-related disciplines, a vast repository of molecular structural data has been documented in scientific publications but remains inaccessible to computational analyses owing to its non-machine-readable format. Optical chemical structure recognition (OCSR) addresses this gap by converting images of chemical molecular structures into a format accessible to computers and convenient for storage, paving the way for further analyses and studies on chemical information. A pivotal initial step in OCSR is automating the noise-free extraction of molecular descriptions from literature. Despite efforts utilising rule-based and deep learning approaches for the extraction process, the accuracy achieved to date is unsatisfactory. To address this issue, we introduce a deep learning model named YoDe-Segmentation in this study, engineered for the automated retrieval of molecular structures from scientific documents. This model operates via a three-stage process encompassing detection, mask generation, and calculation. Initially, it identifies and isolates molecular structures during the detection phase. Subsequently, mask maps are created based on these isolated structures in the mask generation stage. In the final calculation stage, refined and separated mask maps are combined with the isolated molecular structure images, resulting in the acquisition of pure molecular structures. Our model underwent rigorous testing using texts from multiple chemistry-centric journals, with the outcomes subjected to manual validation. The results revealed the superior performance of YoDe-Segmentation compared to alternative algorithms, documenting an average extraction efficiency of 97.62%. This outcome not only highlights the robustness and reliability of the model but also suggests its applicability on a broad scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.