Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37985975›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Machine learning-based approach for predicting low birth weight.

Amene Ranjbar, Farideh Montazeri, Mohammadsadegh Vahidi Farashah, Vahid Mehrnoush, Fatemeh Darsareh, Nasibeh Roozbeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictive Modelling of Low Birth Weight in Pregnancies: A Comparative Analysis of Logistic Regression and Decision Tree Approaches.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Predicting Low Birth Weight in Big Cities in the United States Using a Machine Learning Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amene RanjbarFertility and Infertility Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Farideh MontazeriMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Mohammadsadegh Vahidi FarashahAmirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Vahid MehrnoushMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Fatemeh DarsarehMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran. famadarsareh@yahoo.com.
Nasibeh RoozbehMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow birth weight (LBW) has been linked to infant mortality. Predicting LBW is a valuable preventative tool and predictor of newborn health risks. The current study employed a machine learning model to predict LBW.

methodsThis study implemented predictive LBW models based on the data obtained from the "Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network (IMaN Net)" from January 2020 to January 2022. Women with singleton pregnancies above the gestational age of 24 weeks were included. Exclusion criteria included multiple pregnancies and fetal anomalies. A predictive model was built using eight statistical learning models (logistic regression, decision tree classification, random forest classification, deep learning feedforward, extreme gradient boost model, light gradient boost model, support vector machine, and permutation feature classification with k-nearest neighbors). Expert opinion and prior observational cohorts were used to select candidate LBW predictors for all models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were measured to evaluate their diagnostic performance.

resultsWe found 1280 women with a recorded LBW out of 8853 deliveries, for a frequency of 14.5%. Deep learning (AUROC: 0.86), random forest classification (AUROC: 0.79), and extreme gradient boost classification (AUROC: 0.79) all have higher AUROC and perform better than others. When the other performance parameters of the models mentioned above with higher AUROC were compared, the extreme gradient boost model was the best model to predict LBW with an accuracy of 0.79, precision of 0.87, recall of 0.69, and F1 score of 0.77. According to the feature importance rank, gestational age and prior history of LBW were the top critical predictors.

conclusionsAlthough this study found that the extreme gradient boost model performed well in predicting LBW, more research is needed to make a better conclusion on the performance of ML models in predicting LBW.

Indexed as

FamilyMachine LearningArea Under CurveCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIranPregnancyBirth weightFetal weightLow birth weightMachine learningX gradient boost model

Identifiers

PMID37985975
PMCPMC10662167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.