Trial reportThe journal of headache and pain2023
Long-term effectiveness of eptinezumab in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures: extension of a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in The journal of headache and pain, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04418765 (Interventional, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study With an Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab for the Prevention of Migraine in Patients With Unsuccessful Prior Preventive Treatments), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Interventional, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study With an Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab for the Prevention of Migraine in Patients With Unsuccessful Prior Preventive Treatments
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding the long-term safety of anti-CGRP (receptor) mAbs: a meta-analysis and systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in adults with chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache who also received patient education: 24-week results of the randomized RESOLUTION trial.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Trial
- Long-Term Improvements Following Initial Migraine Response in Eptinezumab-Treated Participants With Migraine for Whom 2-4 Prior Preventive Treatments Have Failed.European journal of neurology · 2026Trial
- Early and Sustained Shift in Headache Day Frequency Following Eptinezumab Treatment in Adults With Migraine for Whom 2-4 Previous Preventive Treatments Have Failed: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized DELIVER Trial.European journal of neurology · 2025Trial
- Pharmacokinetics and safety of eptinezumab in children and adolescents with migraine.Headache · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Impact of eptinezumab on work productivity beyond reductions in monthly migraine days: post hoc analysis of the DELIVER trial.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Trial
- Eptinezumab treatment was associated with longer interictal headache/migraine periods which corresponded to greater improvements in patient-reported quality of life measures.Journal of neurology · 2024Trial
- CGRP-targeted therapies for migraine and the risk of infection.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Twelve-months prospective real-world assessment of effectiveness and safety of eptinezumab in migraine patients difficult-to-treat and naïve to CGRP monoclonal antibodies: results of the French FHU INOVPAIN registry.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Long-Term Reductions in Headache Frequency, Severity, and Disability with Eptinezumab in Adults with Chronic Migraine: Results from the PREVAIL Trial.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
- Sustained Efficacy of Eptinezumab in Participants with Migraine for Whom Prior Preventive Treatments Failed and Who Self-reported Psychiatric Comorbidities: Post Hoc Analysis of the Placebo-controlled DELIVER Trial.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Tracking migraine outcomes over time by age and monoclonal antibody type: a retrospective, single-center, real-world study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Observational
- CGRP and Migraine: Real-World Insights and Future Therapeutic Directions.Annual review of medicine · 2026Review
- Disrupting Migraine Dynamics: A Narrative Review of the Consequences of Modern Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibody Therapies.Neurology and therapy · 2025Review
- Comparing eptinezumab with onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of chronic migraine: a real-world evidence study.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Eptinezumab for the preventive treatment of episodic and chronic migraine: a narrative review.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEptinezumab demonstrated efficacy in adults with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures in the placebo-controlled phase of the DELIVER clinical trial; its long-term effectiveness in this population has not yet been reported. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of eptinezumab in a migraine patient population during the 48-week extension phase of DELIVER.
methodsDELIVER was conducted June 1, 2020 to September 15, 2022. 865 adults with migraine, with documented evidence of 2-4 prior preventive migraine treatment failures and with completion of the 24-week placebo-controlled period of DELIVER received eptinezumab (100 or 300 mg) during the dose-blinded extension, either continuing their randomized dose or, if originally receiving placebo, were randomized 1:1 to an eptinezumab dose (100 or 300 mg). A mixed model for repeated measures was used to evaluate changes from baseline in the number of monthly migraine days (MMDs).
resultsOf 865 patients entering the extension (eptinezumab 100 mg, n = 433; 300 mg, n = 432), 782 (90.4%) completed and 11 (1.3%) discontinued due to an adverse event. Eptinezumab was associated with early and sustained reductions in migraine frequency. Mean MMDs at baseline were approximately 14 days across groups. Mean (standard error) change from baseline in MMDs over the final dosing interval (weeks 61-72) was -6.4 (0.50) with placebo/eptinezumab 100 mg, -7.3 (0.49) with placebo/eptinezumab 300 mg, -7.1 (0.39) with eptinezumab 100 mg, and -7.0 (0.39) with eptinezumab 300 mg. During weeks 61-72, 63-70% of patients demonstrated ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs, and 36-45% demonstrated ≥ 75% reduction. Headache severity and acute medication use reductions, and patient-reported improvements in most bothersome symptom, disease status, quality of life, and work productivity, were observed. Adverse events were generally mild, transient, and similar in frequency/type to previous eptinezumab trials.
conclusionsThe long-term effectiveness and safety/tolerability of eptinezumab in patients with migraine and 2-4 prior preventive treatment failures was demonstrated by high completion rates and migraine-preventive benefits sustained for up to 18 months, implying that eptinezumab is a viable long-term treatment option for patients still seeking successful migraine treatments.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04418765; URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT04418765 ); EudraCT (Identifier: 2019-004497-25; URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2019-004497-25 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.