Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37985914›Full record

ReviewNature human behaviour2023

Machine culture.

Levin Brinkmann, Fabian Baumann, Jean-François Bonnefon, Maxime Derex, Thomas F Müller, Anne-Marie Nussberger, Agnieszka Czaplicka, Alberto Acerbi, Thomas L Griffiths, Joseph Henrich and 5 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature human behaviour, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Group size effects and collective misalignment in LLM multi-agent systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cultural tendencies in generative AI.Nature human behaviour · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Extending Minds with Generative AI.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A new sociology of humans and machines.Nature human behaviour · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. AI emerges as the frontier in behavioral science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. The Emotional Intelligence of the GPT-4 Large Language Model.Psychology in Russia : state of the art · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Levin Brinkmann *Center for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany. brinkmann@mpib-berlin.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1642-8744
Fabian Baumann *Center for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Jean-François Bonnefon *Toulouse School of Economics, Toulouse, France.
Maxime Derex *Toulouse School of Economics, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1512-6496
Thomas F Müller *Center for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Anne-Marie Nussberger *Center for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1805-9399
Agnieszka CzaplickaCenter for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Alberto AcerbiDepartment of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Thomas L GriffithsDepartment of Psychology and Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5138-7255
Joseph HenrichDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5012-0065
Joel Z LeiboDeepMind Technologies Ltd, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3153-916X
Richard McElreathMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0387-5377
Pierre-Yves OudeyerInria, Flowers team, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Jonathan StrayCenter for Human-Compatible Artificial Intelligence, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Iyad Rahwan *Center for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany. rahwan@mpib-berlin.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1796-4303

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of humans to create and disseminate culture is often credited as the single most important factor of our success as a species. In this Perspective, we explore the notion of 'machine culture', culture mediated or generated by machines. We argue that intelligent machines simultaneously transform the cultural evolutionary processes of variation, transmission and selection. Recommender algorithms are altering social learning dynamics. Chatbots are forming a new mode of cultural transmission, serving as cultural models. Furthermore, intelligent machines are evolving as contributors in generating cultural traits-from game strategies and visual art to scientific results. We provide a conceptual framework for studying the present and anticipated future impact of machines on cultural evolution, and present a research agenda for the study of machine culture.

Indexed as

Cultural EvolutionHominidaeAnimalsCultureHumansLearning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.