Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37985854›Full record

ReviewCellular & molecular immunology2024

SARS-CoV-2 and innate immunity: the good, the bad, and the "goldilocks".

Benjamin L Sievers, Mark T K Cheng, Kata Csiba, Bo Meng, Ravindra K Gupta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular & molecular immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of Heat-TreatedNutrients · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Proteomic Analysis of COVID-19 Infection.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin L SieversDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9681-9082
Mark T K ChengDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4323-5574
Kata CsibaDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Bo MengDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. bm432@cam.ac.uk.
Ravindra K GuptaDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. rkg20@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9751-1808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An ancient conflict between hosts and pathogens has driven the innate and adaptive arms of immunity. Knowledge about this interplay can not only help us identify biological mechanisms but also reveal pathogen vulnerabilities that can be leveraged therapeutically. The humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection has been the focus of intense research, and the role of the innate immune system has received significantly less attention. Here, we review current knowledge of the innate immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and the various means SARS-CoV-2 employs to evade innate defense systems. We also consider the role of innate immunity in SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and in the phenomenon of long COVID.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunity, InnatePost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeCOVID-19 VaccinesAntiviral targetsCytokinesInflammationInnate immune responseInterferonSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37985854
PMCPMC10805730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.