Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37985853›Full record

ReviewCommunications biology2023

Chemical communication and its role in sexual selection across Animalia.

Tyler J Buchinger, Weiming Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ecology and evolution of pyrazines in insects.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Proteomics of the Dark-Ventral-Patch Sexual Signal in Male Red Deer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  14. Regulatory Changes in the Fatty Acid ElongasebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The scent of offspring: chemical profiles of larvae change during development and affect parental behavior in a burying beetle.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tyler J BuchingerDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. buching6@msu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4590-341X
Weiming LiDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5437-1518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual selection has been studied as a major evolutionary driver of animal diversity for roughly 50 years. Much evidence indicates that competition for mates favors elaborate signaling traits. However, this evidence comes primarily from a few taxa, leaving sexual selection as a salient evolutionary force across Animalia largely untested. Here, we reviewed the evidence for sexual selection on communication across all animal phyla, classes, and orders with emphasis on chemoreception, the only sense shared across lifeforms. An exhaustive literature review documented evidence for sexual selection on chemosensory traits in 10 of 34 animal phyla and indications of sexual selection on chemosensory traits in an additional 13 phyla. Potential targets of sexual selection include structures and processes involved in production, delivery, and detection of chemical signals. Our review suggests sexual selection plays a widespread role in the evolution of communication and highlights the need for research that better reflects animal diversity.

Indexed as

Sexual SelectionSignal TransductionAnimalsPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID37985853
PMCPMC10662023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.